Skip to main content

Security report for ajpower.lv

AJ Power · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AJ Power is a Latvian-based energy company group specializing in integrated energy and waste management solutions. The company positions itself as the largest private energy group in Latvia and one of the fastest growing in the Baltic region. Their service portfolio includes electricity, natural gas, solar energy, green energy, energy consulting, and resource tax services, targeting primarily business clients. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive information about services and company values. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and includes analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security measures include HTTPS, Cloudflare Turnstile captcha on forms, and cookie consent management, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and consistent with a professional energy services provider. Overall, AJ Power demonstrates a mature digital presence with good security posture and privacy compliance, suitable for its business sector and audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ajpower.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ajpower.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ajpower.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AJ Power operates in the energy sector with a focus on providing a broad portfolio of energy services to businesses in Latvia and the Baltic region. Their competitive advantage lies in combining modern energy solutions with expert consulting and a strong local presence. The company emphasizes transparency, customer service, and sustainability, offering certified green energy products. Revenue indicators suggest a large enterprise with over 110 million euros turnover and more than 500 business clients. The company maintains active social media channels and a professional website, supporting lead generation and customer engagement. Partnerships with web development firms like Sem.lv indicate a strategic approach to digital presence. The business model is B2B focused, leveraging integrated energy solutions and consulting services to optimize client energy costs and compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Cloudflare Turnstile captcha to protect forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements, and privacy policies are clearly presented. However, explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly configured in the HTML, which could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of up-to-date WordPress plugins and libraries is implied but should be regularly audited. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is a gap in transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  5. Continue enhancing privacy compliance by documenting data retention policies and providing clear user data handling explanations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA AJ Power
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AJ Power
Description
100% vietējā kapitāla uzņēmumu grupa, kas apvieno mūsdienīgus enerģētikas un atkritumu apsaimniekošanas risinājumus
Key services
Elektroenerģija, Dabasgāze, Saules enerģija biznesam, Zaļā enerģija, Dabas resursu nodoklis, Enerģētikas projekti, Enerģētikas konsultācijas
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, Contact Form 7, SumoSelect, LazyLoad, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha on forms
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on energy sector services with detailed offerings.
  3. Multiple language support (Latvian and English).
  4. Comprehensive contact forms with GDPR-compliant consent.
  5. Active social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond privacy and cookie policy.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, SumoSelect for enhanced select elements, and lazy loading for images to improve performance. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, managed through Google Tag Manager. The site uses Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for bot protection on forms. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with caching and optimization plugins evident. The technical stack is standard for professional corporate websites, with opportunities to improve security headers and possibly enhance hosting provider transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ajpower.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ajpower.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.