Skip to main content

Security report for aisla.it

AISLA APS · Healthcare · Italy

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AISLA APS is a reputable Italian non-profit association dedicated to supporting individuals affected by Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (SLA). The organization provides patient assistance, funds research, disseminates information, and advocates for patient rights. Their website reflects a well-structured and content-rich platform targeting patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and donors. The association maintains a strong presence through social media and events, reinforcing its market position as a leading SLA support entity in Italy. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a variety of plugins and modern web technologies, offering a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, though improvements are recommended in security headers and library updates. Privacy compliance is robust with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, AISLA demonstrates a trustworthy and professional digital presence aligned with its mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aisla.it

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AISLA operates in the healthcare non-profit sector with a focus on ALS. Its business model revolves around fundraising, patient support, research sponsorship, and awareness campaigns. The organization targets a diverse audience including patients, families, healthcare providers, and donors. The website's integration with social media and event management indicates active community engagement. The presence of a solidarity shop domain suggests diversified fundraising channels. AISLA's market position is strong within Italy, supported by comprehensive content and transparent contact information. The lack of parent or subsidiary companies indicates an independent operational structure. The organization's digital footprint and content quality support sustained growth and stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of outdated jQuery versions introduces potential vulnerabilities that should be addressed. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security misconfigurations were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be strengthened by implementing recommended best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to ensure up-to-date protection.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AISLA APS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AISLA APS
Description
AISLA is an Italian non-profit association dedicated to supporting people affected by Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (SLA) through assistance, research funding, information, and advocacy.
Key services
Patient assistance and counseling, Research funding and coordination, Information dissemination and education, Advocacy for patient rights, Events and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA, AddToAny sharing plugin, Contact Form 7, 3D Flipbook plugin, CM Download Manager, Responsive Vector Maps
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress plugins)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
AddToAny sharing, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit association site focused on ALS (SLA) in Italy.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. Use of multiple social media channels and active event promotion.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy compliance with consent mechanisms.
  5. Security posture is adequate but could be improved with modern security headers and updated libraries.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected, allowing full content access.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a variety of plugins for functionality such as contact forms, event organization, flipbook display, and social sharing. The tech stack includes jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs and social media platforms. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt is indicated by the use of older jQuery versions and missing modern security headers. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aisla.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aisla.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.