Skip to main content

Security report for aikomed.com

AIKO MED SIA · Healthcare · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AIKO MED SIA operates as a specialized e-commerce retailer focused on medical and dental equipment in Latvia. The website offers a product catalog, news updates, and customer support, targeting healthcare professionals and medical equipment buyers. The company has been in operation since 2004, indicating a stable presence in the regional healthcare retail market. The site is professionally designed with good navigation and content relevance, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the website uses a custom CMS with legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.8.3 and Bootstrap, alongside Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. While the site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, there are opportunities to modernize the tech stack and improve accessibility. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but the absence of security headers and use of outdated libraries present vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a significant gap given GDPR requirements. Contact information is clearly provided, including phone numbers, email, and a contact form, enhancing business credibility. However, the lack of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency and legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aikomed.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aikomed.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aikomed.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche supplier of medical and dental equipment in Latvia, leveraging an e-commerce platform to reach healthcare professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized product offerings, including panoramic X-ray machines, autoclaves, and dental instruments, supported by a blog and news updates to engage customers. The business model is retail-focused with direct sales through the website. Revenue streams likely include product sales and possibly service or support contracts. The target customer segment is healthcare providers and dental clinics. The presence of social media channels indicates efforts to build brand awareness and customer engagement. The company appears small but established, with a history dating back to 2004. Partnerships with known brands like Stern Weber and MyRay suggest a credible supplier network. The lack of detailed corporate information and missing WHOIS data may limit trust from new customers or partners. Growth indicators include active content updates and product catalog expansion. Strategic observations recommend enhancing transparency and compliance to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) exposes the site to known vulnerabilities that could be exploited by attackers. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program was found, indicating limited security governance. Forms include client-side validation but lack visible advanced protections such as CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a red flag for domain legitimacy and could indicate privacy protection or registry issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires urgent updates to libraries, implementation of security headers, and improved transparency to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen web security.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Establish a formal security policy and incident response plan, and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure program.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AIKO MED SIA
Description
Medicīnas iekārtas veikals
Key services
Sale of medical equipment, Product catalog, Customer support, News and blog updates
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. Website is a Latvian medical equipment e-commerce store with professional content.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  5. Uses outdated JavaScript libraries with potential security risks.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook supports legitimacy.
  8. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform with legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.8.3 and Bootstrap for UI components. Google Fonts and Font Awesome are used for typography and icons. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, indicating standard tracking practices. The site is mobile responsive and uses multiple CSS files for styling. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. Accessibility is basic, with some placeholder handling and minimal ARIA or semantic enhancements. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph properties but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. The site uses multiple JavaScript libraries for UI interactions and cart management. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with modernization opportunities to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aikomed.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aikomed.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.