Skip to main content

Security report for aifory.pro

Aifory Pro · Finance · Russia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aifory Pro operates as a cryptocurrency exchange service primarily targeting users in Moscow and other Russian cities, offering cash-based crypto buying and selling with an emphasis on anonymity and security. The business also provides wallet creation services and international transfers, supported by mobile applications on iOS and Android platforms. The website is professionally designed, localized primarily in Russian, and includes customer testimonials and social media engagement to build trust. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with proper HTTPS and security headers implemented, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, some privacy compliance aspects like cookie consent are missing, and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the security posture is solid with room for improvement in transparency and privacy mechanisms. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in the crypto sector, but no suspicious patterns were detected. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, adding security policy disclosures, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aifory.pro

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aifory Pro positions itself as a regional leader in cryptocurrency exchange services with a focus on cash transactions in Russia and CIS countries. Its business model combines offline physical offices with online wallet and exchange platforms, catering to a broad audience including retail and premium clients. The company leverages social media and Telegram channels for customer engagement and support. The presence of a premium exchange service targeting large transactions indicates a tiered service offering. The lack of publicly available company registration details and domain privacy protection is typical in this industry but warrants cautious monitoring. The company’s ecosystem includes related domains for app and main service platforms, suggesting an integrated service environment. Growth indicators include mobile app availability and active social media presence. The business is medium-sized with a clear focus on finance and technology sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. The site collects user data via forms (Telegram username and messages) but lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms, which may impact GDPR compliance. The use of third-party analytics (Yandex Metrika) introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but could be improved by formalizing security and privacy policies and enhancing user consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response information to improve trust and preparedness.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aifory Pro
Description
Быстро обменять криптовалюту на наличные или купить крипту за наличные через офлайн криптообменник Aifory Pro в Москве. У нас вы можете вывести криптовалюту без комиссий. Анонимность без верификации, безопасность проведения сделок.
Key services
Cryptocurrency exchange for cash, Cryptocurrency wallet creation, International transfers, Premium exchange services for large amounts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, Yandex Metrika
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web, iOS app, Android app
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with some English alternate links.
  3. Focus on cryptocurrency exchange services with physical offices in Russia and CIS countries.
  4. Multiple social media and Telegram channels linked for customer support and communication.
  5. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  6. Privacy policy and terms of use pages are present and linked.
  7. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  8. Modern web technologies used including Next.js and React.
  9. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  10. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond standard legal pages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and good SEO performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloads critical images and fonts for performance. External scripts include Yandex Metrika for analytics. The site uses SVG logos and icons for scalability and performance. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, canonical links, and hreflang attributes. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by improving privacy compliance and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aifory.pro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aifory.pro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.