Skip to main content

Security report for aia.lv

Latvijas farmaceitiskās aprūpes asociācija · Healthcare · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas farmaceitiskās aprūpes asociācija (LFAA) is a Latvian non-profit organization established in 2008 that unites four pharmacy companies focused on advancing pharmaceutical care in Latvia. The website clearly communicates the association's mission, goals, and member companies, targeting Latvian residents and healthcare professionals. The digital presence is built on WordPress with the Avada theme, incorporating modern web technologies and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and professionally designed, providing a positive user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are recommended for compliance and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the website content and domain appear legitimate and consistent with the stated business purpose. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid foundation with room for improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aia.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aia.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aia.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LFAA holds a stable market position as a key non-profit association representing major pharmacy companies in Latvia. Its business model focuses on advocacy, regulatory improvement, and expanding pharmacy healthcare services. The association's partnerships with four prominent pharmacy chains strengthen its influence and outreach. The website content and linked domains confirm these partnerships. The organization targets healthcare stakeholders and the general Latvian population, emphasizing pharmaceutical care accessibility and quality. Growth indicators include active news updates and participation in international forums. The lack of detailed business registration data online limits deeper corporate intelligence, but the association's transparency and clear mission support credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and uses standard WordPress security practices. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, limiting formal incident response channels. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible cookie consent mechanisms or detailed privacy policies, which may pose regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, formal policies, and enhanced privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas farmaceitiskās aprūpes asociācija
Description
Nevalstiska organizācija, kas darbojas kopš 2008. gada un apvieno četrus aptieku uzņēmumus, kam ir īpaši svarīga iedzīvotāju farmaceitiskās aprūpes attīstība Latvijā.
Key services
Advocacy for pharmaceutical care, Regulatory improvement, Expanding pharmacy healthcare services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Avada WordPress Theme 7.2.1
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page.
  4. Contact email info@lfaa.lv found in footer.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with Avada theme.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No social media links detected in provided HTML.
  10. Website content is professional and healthcare focused.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using the Avada theme, a popular and feature-rich framework. It leverages jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Fonts for typography. Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with semantic HTML and CSS. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information was found. The site could benefit from performance optimizations such as caching and minification. The absence of security headers and privacy controls indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires enhancements to meet modern security and privacy standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aia.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aia.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.