Polskie Stowarzyszenie Agrowoltaiki · Energy · Poland
High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.
Polskie Stowarzyszenie Agrowoltaiki is a Polish non-profit organization dedicated to promoting the integration of agricultural production with solar energy generation, known as agrowoltaika. The association focuses on environmental protection, sustainable agriculture, and the development of regulatory frameworks to support this emerging sector in Poland. Their website provides educational resources, news updates, reports, and contact channels to engage stakeholders and the public. The organization positions itself as a key advocate for agrowoltaika within Poland, aligning with broader European and global renewable energy trends. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing modern plugins such as Smart Slider 3, Contact Form 7 with Bootstrap styling, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. The site is mobile-optimized, has good SEO practices, and loads with moderate performance. However, some security best practices like HTTP security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could be improved to enhance compliance and protection. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse on forms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain registration legitimacy, but the active and professional nature of the site supports its credibility. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional headers and privacy compliance enhancements. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations to implement cookie consent for GDPR compliance, add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, and maintain regular updates of WordPress components. These steps will strengthen trust and security culture while ensuring regulatory adherence.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Cloudflare
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention agrowoltaika.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for agrowoltaika.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with agrowoltaika.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agrowoltaika.org.