Skip to main content

Security report for agrofilm.sk

Agrofilm · Media · Slovakia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agrofilm is an international film festival dedicated to agri-food issues, primarily targeting filmmakers, agricultural professionals, media, and the general public interested in agriculture and food production topics. The website serves as an information hub for festival news, program details, film catalogs, and media relations. It is positioned as a niche cultural event within Slovakia and the broader international agri-food community. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks some advanced security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, though it could improve by adding explicit contact details and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agrofilm.sk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival operates in the media sector with a focus on agriculture and food-related film content. Its business model revolves around event organization and cultural promotion. The website reflects a small-sized organization with a clear target audience and niche market positioning. The use of WordPress and Elementor indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The festival maintains GDPR compliance and uses WP Statistics for analytics. There are no indications of advertising or affiliate marketing, emphasizing a focus on content and event promotion rather than commercial monetization.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks visible security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No security.txt or incident response contact information is present. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries in the visible HTML. Regular updates and security hardening are advisable to maintain and improve security maturity. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security contact may limit responsiveness to security issues.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance security.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Publish explicit contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agrofilm
Description
Agrofilm is an international film festival dedicated to agri-food issues, showcasing films related to agriculture, food production, and related topics.
Key services
Film festival organization, Film catalog publication, Media relations, Event programming
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Astra Theme, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation
  2. Cookie consent and GDPR privacy policy implemented
  3. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected in HTML
  4. No terms of service page found
  5. Contact information primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in HTML
  6. Uses WordPress with Elementor and Astra theme
  7. No advertising or affiliate programs detected
  8. WP Statistics used for analytics
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular CMS (WordPress) with Elementor for page building and Astra as the theme, indicating a well-supported and flexible technical infrastructure. The presence of jQuery and other standard libraries is typical for WordPress sites. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO basics are covered with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. The cookie consent plugin is well integrated, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the technical stack is solid for a small to medium-sized cultural event website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agrofilm.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agrofilm.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.