Skip to main content

Security report for agnosys.at

Agnosys GmbH · Energy · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agnosys GmbH is a specialized Austrian company providing advanced products and systems for preventive fire protection automation. Their offerings include bus-based fire safety systems, smart visualization tools, and automated self-monitoring protocols, targeting building planners and fire safety professionals. The company positions itself as a niche provider with scalable solutions for various building sizes. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting a positive business and security profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agnosys.at

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
77
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agnosys operates in the energy sector focusing on fire safety automation. Their business model is B2B, serving clients requiring integration and automation of fire safety systems. The company leverages digital tools for smart visualization and automated protocols, indicating a focus on innovation. Their market presence is regional (Austria) with a clear target audience of technical professionals in building safety. The website content and structure support a professional image with consistent branding and trust signals such as testimonials and detailed contact info. Partnerships include a dedicated login portal, and marketing efforts utilize major platforms like Google, LinkedIn, and Mailchimp.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management via Borlabs Cookie, and no exposed sensitive data. The use of multiple tracking and marketing scripts is balanced with user consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are absent, which could be improved. Security headers are not explicitly confirmed and should be audited. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the visible content or WHOIS data. Overall, the site is secure for its business purpose but could enhance transparency on security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration tests to proactively identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Agnosys GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agnosys GmbH
Description
Agnosys GmbH provides products and systems for preventive fire protection measures, specializing in automation of fire safety systems including smoke and heat extraction, ventilation, and fire damper integration scalable for all building sizes.
Key services
Fire safety system automation, Bus-based fire alarm control, Smart visualization and CAD integration, Automated self-monitoring protocols
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.10, Bootstrap CSS/JS, jQuery 3.2.1 and 3.6.0, Borlabs Cookie plugin, Contact Form 7, FooBox Image Lightbox, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Mailchimp
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Borlabs Cookie)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (implied by Google Tag Manager)
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel (via Borlabs Cookie), Twitter Pixel (via Borlabs Cookie), YouTube (via embedded content)
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent requirements
  3. Professional business presentation focused on fire safety automation
  4. Use of modern web technologies and standard WordPress plugins
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  6. Comprehensive cookie management with Borlabs Cookie plugin
  7. Multiple external tracking and marketing tools integrated with user consent
  8. Clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address
  9. No terms of service page detected
  10. No explicit security or incident response policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.10 using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. It integrates Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management, Contact Form 7 for forms, and FooBox for image lightbox functionality. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Pixel, and Mailchimp. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for the business needs, with room for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agnosys.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agnosys.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.