Skip to main content

Security report for agil-bamberg.de

AGIL Bamberg · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AGIL Bamberg is a small, specialized tourism service provider offering city tours, museum pedagogical programs, and cultural events primarily in Bamberg and surrounding regions. The website is well-structured and targets a broad audience including adults, children, and individual guests. The business positions itself as a leading local operator with a focus on authentic cultural experiences. Technically, the site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The presence of a cookie consent banner and links to privacy and terms pages indicate a reasonable level of privacy compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agil-bamberg.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality and tourism sector with a focus on guided tours and cultural events. Its business model relies on direct customer engagement through bookings and events. The website reflects a consistent brand and cooperation with regional partners, such as holiday apartment providers. The use of livestreams suggests adaptation to digital trends. The company maintains clear contact channels and privacy practices, supporting customer trust. Growth potential exists through expanded digital offerings and partnerships.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of visible security headers and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement. The loading of multiple jQuery versions could pose minor risks if not managed properly. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices such as CSP, HSTS, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Consolidate JavaScript libraries to avoid loading multiple versions of jQuery.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Conduct a security audit to verify no vulnerable libraries or exposed data exist.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AGIL Bamberg
Description
AGIL offers city tours, museum education, guided tours, old town sightseeing, tourism, and beer tours in Bamberg, Forchheim & Upper Franconia.
Key services
City tours for adults, Museum pedagogical tours for children and youth, Individual guest tours, Special events and livestreams
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Owl Carousel, jQuery UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to tourism and cultural services.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user choice.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published.
  5. Use of multiple Google tracking services indicates moderate user tracking.
  6. No email addresses explicitly found in HTML content; contact likely via contact page.
  7. Phone number clearly displayed in header for customer contact.
  8. No visible forms in provided HTML except links to booking and contact pages.
  9. No Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected in HTML head.
  10. No security headers information provided; recommend audit for headers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery and carousel plugins for UI elements. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are integrated for user tracking. The site uses standard CSS and JavaScript files hosted on the same domain. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected. Performance is moderate with some redundant script loading. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph. Mobile optimization is basic but could be improved. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider and domain age details are not explicitly available.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agil-bamberg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agil-bamberg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.