Skip to main content

Security report for agcapital.eu

AG Capital · Finance · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AG Capital is a Latvian-based financial consulting firm specializing in outsourced financial director services and comprehensive financial planning and analysis for medium-sized businesses. Established since at least 2010, the company offers a broad range of services including budgeting, profitability analysis, investment forecasting, cash flow management, competitor analysis, financing acquisition, business plan development, and financial training. Their client base spans 15 countries with over 249 clients, indicating a solid market presence and trust in their expertise. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including popular plugins for forms, sliders, multilingual support, and GDPR compliance. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with good performance and accessibility standards. The use of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and MailerLite indicates a mature digital marketing and analytics infrastructure, balanced with user consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and cookie consent management. However, explicit security headers are not clearly detected, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, registered via GoDaddy without privacy protection, matching the business claims. Overall, AG Capital's website demonstrates a professional, secure, and compliant online presence suitable for its financial consulting business. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and vulnerability disclosure could further enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agcapital.eu

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AG Capital operates in the financial consulting sector, targeting medium-sized enterprises that require outsourced CFO and financial planning services. Their competitive advantage lies in a highly qualified team, including a CFA charterholder, and a comprehensive service portfolio that addresses budgeting, profitability, investment analysis, and financing. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored financial solutions and training. The company has established a broad client network across multiple countries, indicating effective market penetration and reputation. Partnerships and client logos displayed suggest a strong ecosystem and credibility. Growth indicators include active blog content and client testimonials. The multilingual website supports expansion and accessibility to diverse markets.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. The use of security and privacy plugins like Complianz GDPR enhances compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or security policy pages are present, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain registration is legitimate and consistent with the business. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to reduce risk from outdated components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a strong security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AG Capital
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AG Capital
Description
AG Capital provides outsourced financial director services and financial planning and analysis solutions tailored for medium-sized companies. They assist businesses in budgeting, profitability analysis, investment return forecasting, cash flow planning, competitor analysis, financing acquisition, business plan development, business valuation, and financial training.
Key services
Outsourced financial director services, Budget development, Profitability analysis, Cost calculation, Investment return forecasting, Cash flow budgeting, Competitor analysis, Financing acquisition, Business plan development, Business valuation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, MasterSlider, Contact Form 7, Download Manager, MailerLite, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Stock Ticker plugin, WPML (multilingual plugin), Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of security plugins (Complianz GDPR)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MailerLite, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to financial consulting.
  3. Multiple client logos and testimonials enhance trust.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented in multiple locations.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a robust set of plugins for enhanced functionality including Contact Form 7 for forms, MasterSlider for image sliders, WPML for multilingual support, and Complianz for GDPR cookie compliance. The tech stack includes jQuery and various JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics integration. Hosting and domain registration are managed by GoDaddy. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident through meta tags and structured data. The site uses JSON-LD structured data for organization and article markup, improving search engine understanding. Technical risks are minimal but include potential plugin vulnerabilities and lack of advanced security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and improve accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agcapital.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agcapital.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.