Skip to main content

Security report for agatehotel.lv

Agate Hotel · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agate Hotel is a small hospitality business located in Ozolnieki, Latvia, offering hotel accommodations, restaurant services, event organization including weddings and conferences, and sports camps. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions and integrates trusted booking platforms such as booking.com and tripadvisor, enhancing its market credibility. The target audience includes travelers, leisure guests, and business clients seeking accommodation and event services in the region. Technically, the website uses a simple but effective stack including jQuery and custom JavaScript, with good mobile optimization and basic SEO practices. However, it lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but missing key security headers and policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate based on external references and website content. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agatehotel.lv

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agate Hotel operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on local and regional clientele. Its competitive advantage lies in combining accommodation with event hosting and dining services, supported by integration with major booking platforms. The business model relies on direct bookings and third-party platforms, targeting tourists and business travelers. The presence on social media and review sites like tripadvisor supports reputation management. Growth potential exists through improved digital marketing and enhanced online presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides clear contact information, supporting customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML content. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No forms collecting sensitive data are present, reducing immediate risk exposure. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found, limiting transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hospitality site but requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate if not already done.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search rankings.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agate Hotel
Description
Viesnīca Agate ir naktsmītne Ozolniekos, Jelgavas novadā, Latvijā, piedāvājot 23 numurus ar mūsdienu ērtībām, restorānu un atpūtas zonas. Tā ir piemērota gan atpūtniekiem, gan biznesa ceļotājiem.
Key services
naktsmītnes, restorāns, pasākumu organizēšana, konferences, sporta nometnes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, custom JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms with sensitive inputs detected
  • No exposed credentials in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the hotel and services.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the site.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  6. Booking.com is integrated for reservations, indicating a professional booking channel.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in the HTML content.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond jQuery and custom scripts.
  9. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; domain registration details unknown.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with jQuery 3.5.1 and custom JavaScript, supported by CSS and HTML5. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph properties but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the HTML content. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features, which could impact trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agatehotel.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agatehotel.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.