Skip to main content

Security report for aflacmedicaresupplement.com

Aflac Medicare Supplement · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.aflacmedicaresupplement.com represents a Medicare Supplement insurance offering underwritten by Tier One Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Aflac Incorporated, and administered by Aetna Life Insurance Company. It targets Medicare beneficiaries seeking supplemental insurance to cover gaps in Original Medicare. The site provides quote request forms, prominently displays contact phone numbers, and uses trusted branding and official Medicare resources. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks (Vue.js), integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and secure form handling, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. The WHOIS data is notably missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional appearance and affiliation with reputable insurance entities. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and trustworthy from a user perspective but requires verification of domain registration to fully confirm legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aflacmedicaresupplement.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aflacmedicaresupplement.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aflacmedicaresupplement.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare insurance sector, specifically offering Medicare Supplement plans. It leverages the strong brand equity of Aflac and its subsidiary Tier One Insurance Company, with administration by Aetna Life Insurance Company. The business model focuses on direct consumer engagement via online quote requests and licensed agent consultations. The presence of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates an active digital marketing strategy. The company targets seniors and Medicare beneficiaries in the United States, with plans available nationwide. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer education. Partnerships with Aetna and Aflac enhance credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include expansion messaging and multiple state-specific policy references. The absence of WHOIS data is a risk factor that should be addressed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure form implementations including anti-forgery tokens. The use of reputable analytics and marketing services is balanced with privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners and privacy policies. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The missing WHOIS registration data is a significant anomaly that could indicate privacy protection or registration issues, warranting further investigation. Overall, the site is secure for users but could improve in security communication and incident preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and publish accurate WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Consider publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to strengthen GDPR compliance signals.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tier One Insurance Company
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aflac Medicare Supplement
Description
Aflac Medicare Supplement insurance coverage is underwritten by Tier One Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Aflac Incorporated, and administered by Aetna Life Insurance Company. The website offers Medicare Supplement insurance plans to help cover costs not paid by Original Medicare.
Key services
Medicare Supplement Insurance plans, Quote requests via ZIP code forms, Licensed insurance agent consultation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Axios, Date-fns, Core-js, Inputmask, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, Invoca
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with anti-forgery tokens
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Bing UET
Marketing tools
Invoca, Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional insurance product website with clear branding and contact info
  3. Multiple forms collect ZIP code for quote requests with validation
  4. No email addresses explicitly listed; contact primarily via phone and forms
  5. Strong use of tracking and analytics scripts for marketing and performance
  6. Privacy and cookie policies present with consent mechanisms
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and warrants further investigation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Vue.js and several JavaScript libraries for form validation, date handling, and HTTP requests. It uses Umbraco CMS inferred from URL patterns and class names. The site integrates multiple analytics and marketing platforms such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, and Invoca for call tracking. Performance is moderate with preloading of critical CSS and JS assets. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, including skip links and ARIA labels. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured. The site uses server-side anti-forgery tokens in forms to prevent CSRF attacks. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure user experience but could benefit from enhanced transparency on hosting and security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aflacmedicaresupplement.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aflacmedicaresupplement.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.