Skip to main content

Security report for affinitygrouppublishing.com

Newsmatics Inc. dba Affinity Group Publishing · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Affinity Group Publishing operates as a global media publishing network under Newsmatics Inc., offering a broad portfolio of over 3,900 news publications worldwide. The company focuses on supporting local journalism and filling news deserts with niche and regional news content. Their market position is that of a significant global news network with a specialized focus on affinity groups and local news coverage. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript modules, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking and analytics, with a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and professional content presentation. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and provides cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that impacts trust and legitimacy assessments. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and compliant with privacy regulations but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching affinitygrouppublishing.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Affinity Group Publishing's business model centers on media publishing with a global footprint, targeting readers interested in local and niche news topics. Their competitive advantage lies in the extensive network of publications and focus on underserved news markets. Revenue streams likely include advertising and sponsored content across their multiple news sites. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and legal policies, supporting credibility. Partnerships appear to be primarily internal within their network of publications. Growth indicators include a large portfolio of sites and a focus on emerging news deserts. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to strengthen security posture and WHOIS transparency to enhance trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents compliance gaps and potential risk areas. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of a security.txt file or similar disclosure reduces transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a media website but could be significantly improved by adopting formal security policies and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance website security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and broaden audience reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Newsmatics Inc. dba Affinity Group Publishing
Description
Affinity Group Publishing is a global publishing network presenting news from Boston to Bangladesh. Their news sites cover all countries and include 3,900+ publications. They support local journalism and focus on niche topics and filling news deserts.
Key services
Publishing news publications, Supporting local journalism, Providing news coverage by topics, regions, countries, and US states
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Day.js, JavaScript ES Modules, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a .com domain.
  3. Website uses modern JavaScript modules and analytics tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact phone number and contact page are clearly provided.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Website content is professional and focused on news publishing.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. External links mostly point to owned or related news publications.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including ES modules, Google Tag Manager, and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML and CSS are valid and the site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack supports a scalable publishing platform but lacks advanced security headers and formalized security infrastructure. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security and accessibility would enhance overall quality and reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with affinitygrouppublishing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review affinitygrouppublishing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.