Skip to main content

Security report for affidea.com

Affidea · Healthcare · Multiple (europe-wide)

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Affidea is a leading European healthcare provider specializing in advanced diagnostic imaging and outpatient services, operating over 315 centers across 15 countries. The company focuses on delivering personalized, high-quality care through a network of specialized medical experts and state-of-the-art technology. Their services include MRI, CT, X-Ray, Ultrasound, Mammography, Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT, laboratory analysis, and outpatient specialty consultations. The website reflects a large, well-established healthcare network with a strong presence in multiple European markets. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced and some security best practices are observed, though explicit security headers and incident response information are lacking. The WHOIS data is notably absent, with no registrar or creation date information available, which raises some concerns about transparency. However, the professional presentation, extensive contact information, and multi-country presence support the legitimacy of the business. Privacy and cookie policies are not detected in the provided content, indicating an area for compliance improvement. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy from a business and content perspective but could enhance its privacy compliance and security posture to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching affidea.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
100
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention affidea.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,364
Employees
78
Customers
2,130
Third parties
156
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-06-15 · 65 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for affidea.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.affidea.com2026-06-15
  • –sts.affidea.com2026-06-11
  • –sts.affidea.com2026-06-06
  • –sts.affidea.com2026-06-06
  • –sts.affidea.com2026-05-27

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Affidea holds a strong market position as a leading provider of diagnostic imaging and outpatient healthcare services in Europe. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive network of over 315 centers across 15 countries, offering a wide range of advanced medical imaging and specialty outpatient services. The business model focuses on partnerships with private health insurers, NHS, and direct patient care, emphasizing quality, safety, and accessibility. Revenue streams likely include diagnostic imaging services, outpatient consultations, and specialized treatments such as radiotherapy. The target customer segments include patients requiring diagnostic imaging, private insurers, and healthcare providers. Growth indicators include continuous expansion across European countries and investment in advanced technology. The partnership ecosystem includes country-specific Affidea sites and specialized clinics. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining clinical excellence, expanding service offerings, and enhancing digital presence to sustain market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of security-conscious script loading. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance gaps include missing visible privacy and cookie policies, lack of incident response contact information, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Data protection practices are not explicitly detailed, and there is no mention of a data protection officer. Incident response readiness appears limited based on available information. The security culture indicators are inferred from the use of modern analytics and tracking tools but lack transparency in security policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from enhanced transparency and implementation of additional security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Affidea
Description
Affidea is the leading provider of advanced diagnostic imaging and outpatient services in Europe, operating 315 centres in 15 countries. They manage care ensuring patients receive appropriate, personalized care from leading medical experts. They emphasize internationally benchmarked standardized care, high standards of clinical governance, and world-leading safety standards.
Key services
MRI, CT, X-Ray, Ultrasound, Mammography, Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT, Laboratory analysis, Outpatient specialty consultations, Radiotherapy (in some centers)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API, Gmap3 (Google Maps wrapper)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related scripts loaded with integrity and crossorigin attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Application Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about healthcare services.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a large healthcare provider.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Multiple contact emails and phone numbers are available for various centers.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  6. No security policy or incident response contact information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. No data protection officer contact found.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The site loads external resources with integrity and crossorigin attributes, enhancing security. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with affidea.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review affidea.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.