Skip to main content

Security report for aetnastudenthealth.com

Aetna Student Health · Healthcare · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aetna Student Health operates as a specialized branch of Aetna Inc., providing student health insurance plans to colleges and universities across the United States. The website serves as a portal for students and administrators to access insurance information, find providers, and manage their health plans. The business is positioned as a large, established player in the healthcare insurance sector with a focus on educational institutions. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Adobe's analytics and tag management tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the strong branding and official domain references. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, publishing security policies, and improving transparency around domain registration.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of aetnastudenthealth.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aetnastudenthealth.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aetnastudenthealth.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aetnastudenthealth.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets students and educational institutions, offering tailored health insurance products. Its market position is strong due to affiliation with Aetna Inc., a major healthcare insurer. The business model relies on partnerships with colleges and universities to provide insurance coverage. Revenue streams likely include premiums from student plans and administrative fees. The website supports customer engagement through member portals and provider locators. Growth indicators include extensive school listings and COVID-19 related updates, showing responsiveness to current health concerns. The partnership ecosystem includes Aetna's broader corporate network. Operationally, the company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and legal disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via privacy policies but lacks explicit cookie consent. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced communication and technical controls. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a clear cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency or domain registration information to strengthen legitimacy signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aetna Student Health Agency Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aetna Student Health
Description
Aetna Student Health offers student health insurance plans to many colleges and universities throughout the country.
Key services
student health insurance plans, member website access, provider network locator
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (Adobe DTM), Slick Carousel, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with labels and validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe DTM, Medallia
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM, Medallia feedback
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to student health insurance.
  3. No explicit or adult content detected.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces transparency.
  5. Website uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Adobe analytics/tracking tools.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner found, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  7. Contact information includes phone numbers and address in footer and accessibility section.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS, indicating a robust enterprise-grade content management system. JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel provide interactive UI elements. Adobe Dynamic Tag Management and Adobe Analytics are used for marketing and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with semantic HTML and ARIA roles. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous script loading and optimized images. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely managed by Aetna's infrastructure or a trusted cloud provider.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aetnastudenthealth.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aetnastudenthealth.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.