Skip to main content

Security report for aeschile.com

AES Chile · Energy · Chile

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AES Chile operates as a major energy company focused on accelerating the future of energy through sustainable and innovative solutions. The company emphasizes renewable energy, advanced energy networks, energy storage, and community partnerships. The website reflects a strong corporate presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and consistent branding. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 with modern frontend technologies and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools. However, a critical security gap exists due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS configuration, which significantly impacts the security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented with consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image but requires urgent security improvements to protect users and data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aeschile.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AES Chile is positioned as a leading energy provider in Chile and Latin America, with a focus on renewable energy and sustainability. The business model revolves around energy generation, storage, and community engagement. The company is part of the global AES Corporation with multiple regional subsidiaries. The website supports business growth through clear communication of services, press releases, and career opportunities. The extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests reliance on contact forms and social media for communication. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, reinforcing legitimacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates partial adherence to security best practices with several security headers and a strict Content Security Policy. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical vulnerability that undermines user trust and data security. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may indicate gaps in transparency or preparedness. The extensive use of third-party tracking and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and requires careful management. Overall, the security posture is weak due to missing fundamental HTTPS protections, despite other positive header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  6. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve performance.
  7. Add explicit company contact emails and phone numbers with clear labeling for user trust.
  8. Regularly audit and update security headers and Content Security Policy to maintain protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS with a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Slick Carousel, GSAP, and other libraries. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Pardot, Qualtrics, and New Relic. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. However, the DNS data provided is incomplete or missing key records, which may indicate an issue with DNS configuration or data collection. Performance data was not available, so performance assessment is limited. The lack of SSL/TLS support is a major technical risk that must be addressed immediately to ensure secure communications.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aeschile.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aeschile.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.