Skip to main content

Security report for aegisdentalnetwork.com

Conexiant · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Conexiant operates as a global healthcare content platform specializing in dental publications and clinical education. The website positions itself as a leading destination for trusted clinical content and educational resources aimed at healthcare professionals, particularly in the dental sector. The business appears established with a domain age dating back to 2001, indicating a mature presence in the healthcare information market. The platform's business model revolves around content delivery, audience engagement, and educational services, targeting healthcare practitioners and specialists. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and advanced analytics tools such as Matomo, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Marketo Munchkin. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, supported by DNS and cookie data. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. The presence of multiple marketing and tracking scripts indicates a sophisticated approach to user engagement and advertising. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, it lacks DNSSEC and does not appear to implement or advertise comprehensive security headers or policies. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found on the analyzed page, which is a compliance gap. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization and user controls. No direct contact or incident response information is published, limiting transparency. Overall, Conexiant's website is professional and trustworthy with a strong business credibility score. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and security best practices, particularly the absence of explicit policies and security headers. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aegisdentalnetwork.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Conexiant holds a strong market position as a healthcare content provider with a focus on dental professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in combining trusted clinical content with deep audience engagement and a broad education library. The business model is content-driven, likely monetized through advertising, partnerships, and educational services. The target customer segment includes healthcare practitioners seeking clinical knowledge and continuing education. The company demonstrates growth potential through digital marketing and analytics investments. Partnerships with marketing and analytics providers like Marketo and AdRoll suggest a mature marketing ecosystem. The absence of direct contact details on the analyzed page may indicate a focus on B2B or professional audiences rather than direct consumer engagement.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration protections are in place, which are foundational security measures. The use of Cookiebot for cookie consent reflects attention to privacy compliance. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represent missed opportunities to harden security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The extensive use of third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts reduces transparency and preparedness visibility. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could improve in advanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from all site pages.
  3. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conexiant
Description
The leading global healthcare destination that combines the most trusted clinical content, the deepest audience engagement, and the broadest education library.
Key services
Clinical content, Audience engagement, Education library
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Bootstrap 5.1.1, Swiper 11, Google Fonts (Poppins, Raleway), Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), Matomo Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo Munchkin, Pushly SDK, AdRoll, AIM Tag, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Use of security status domain statuses (clientDeleteProhibited etc.)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo Munchkin
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Matomo, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo Munchkin, Pushly
Marketing tools
Marketo, Pushly, BlueConic
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses multiple advanced analytics and marketing tools.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the analyzed page.
  4. No direct contact information (email, phone, address) found on the page.
  5. Website content is focused on healthcare publications, specifically dental.
  6. Domain is well aged and registered with a reputable registrar.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Use of modern frontend frameworks and libraries.
  9. No obvious security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No security or incident response policies published on the page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Swiper for interactive elements. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing platforms such as Matomo, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Marketo Munchkin, and AdRoll, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS, supported by AWS DNS servers and load balancing cookies. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted libraries. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but present. The site lacks explicit CMS identification, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy documentation are recommended to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aegisdentalnetwork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aegisdentalnetwork.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.