Skip to main content

Security report for advies.chat

Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Soatestwijzer.nl is a Dutch healthcare advisory website focused on providing anonymous guidance on sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing, including HIV, chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis. The site targets individuals in the Netherlands seeking information on which tests are important and where to get tested. The business operates as an informational service without visible commercial transactions or direct contact details. Technically, the website is built using modern Angular framework (version 15) and employs web fonts and icons for a consistent user interface. It uses Matomo analytics for user tracking, indicating some privacy consideration. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and no contact or security incident channels are provided. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but no advanced security headers detected. Overall, the site is functional and moderately professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching advies.chat

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a niche healthcare advisory role in the Dutch market, focusing on STI testing awareness. Its competitive advantage lies in anonymity and targeted advice. The business model appears informational, likely supported by public health initiatives or partnerships, though no explicit business or parent company information is provided. The target audience is individuals concerned about sexual health in the Netherlands. The site’s longevity since 2015 suggests stable operations. The lack of contact details and formal policies may limit trust and growth potential. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is basic to moderate. HTTPS is in use, but no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields are present on the analyzed page, reducing attack surface. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR requirements. Incident response mechanisms and vulnerability disclosure policies are not found, which could hinder timely security issue management. Use of Matomo analytics suggests some privacy-conscious tracking, but overall privacy compliance is weak.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently link a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data handling and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with EU cookie laws and inform users about tracking.
  3. Publish contact information specifically for security incidents and abuse reporting to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and a vulnerability disclosure policy to increase transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Soatestwijzer.nl adviseert welke soa-testen voor jou belangrijk zijn. En waar je het beste kunt testen. Alles wat je invult blijft anoniem.
Key services
Advice on which STI tests are important, Information on where to get tested
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 15, Roboto font, Material Icons, Font Awesome, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
  • No sensitive data exposed in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides anonymous advice on STI testing in Dutch language
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided
  4. Uses Matomo for analytics, indicating some privacy awareness
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies
  6. No forms detected on the analyzed page
  7. No social media links found except Twitter handle in meta tag
  8. Website uses modern Angular framework and web fonts
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Angular 15 framework, modern web fonts (Roboto), Material Icons, and Font Awesome for UI elements, indicating a contemporary front-end technology stack. Hosting appears stable with AutoDNS as registrar and Matomo Cloud for analytics. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and fonts. Mobile optimization is good, with viewport meta tags and responsive styles. Accessibility features are basic, including skip links for navigation. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. No broken elements or errors detected in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with advies.chat. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review advies.chat.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.