Skip to main content

Security report for adsinteractive.com

Ads Interactive Media Group · Media · Hungary

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ads Interactive Media Group operates as a specialized ad monetization platform targeting digital publishers and advertisers. Established in 2010, the company offers header bidding solutions, rich media templates, and retail media services, positioning itself as a Google Certified Partner with a strong network of premium demand partners. Their platform emphasizes revenue optimization and brand safety, supported by a dedicated customer success and AdOps team. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear calls to action and comprehensive service descriptions. Technically, the site employs modern marketing and analytics technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, with Cloudflare DNS providing reliable hosting infrastructure. Privacy compliance is well addressed through GDPR consent mechanisms and cookie policies, although explicit security policies and incident response details are absent. The security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain registration protections but could be enhanced by adding security headers and vulnerability disclosure information. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-structured, and serves its business purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adsinteractive.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
70
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the digital advertising and media sector, leveraging partnerships with industry leaders like Google, Criteo, and Prebid. Their business model focuses on providing a seamless, full-stack ad monetization solution for publishers, including integration support and advanced reporting tools. The presence of multiple industry certifications and memberships underscores their credibility and commitment to quality. Their target customers are digital publishers seeking to optimize ad revenue and advertisers looking for premium rich media solutions. The company demonstrates financial stability and growth potential, supported by a medium-sized operational scale and a clear focus on innovation and brand safety.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes multiple EPP status locks, indicating protection against unauthorized transfers or deletions. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The company should consider publishing a security policy, incident response procedures, and a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity but lacks some advanced security communication elements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ads Interactive Media Group
Description
Ads Interactive is an ad monetization platform that helps publishers to increase their revenue with the best header bidding solutions. They were one of the first Google MCM partners.
Key services
Ad monetization platform, Header bidding solutions, Rich media solutions, Retail media, Publisher User Interface (PUI), Customer success and AdOps support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, InMobi Consent Manager, Flickity carousel, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Google Ad Manager, Criteo
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
InMobi Consent Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and responsive layout.
  2. Strong emphasis on privacy compliance with GDPR consent mechanisms.
  3. Multiple premium ad demand partners and industry memberships displayed.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone number.
  8. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and InMobi Consent Manager for marketing and analytics. The Flickity library is used for carousel UI components. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing reliable and performant DNS resolution. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and lazy loading for images and videos. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of images. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks are minimal but could be mitigated further by adding security headers and improving accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adsinteractive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adsinteractive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.