Skip to main content

Security report for adrop.lv

Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a small local cocktail bar named A'Drop located in Riga, Latvia. It provides basic information about its operating hours, contact details, and location. The business targets adults interested in nightlife and cocktail experiences. The site is built on WordPress using the Flynt framework and includes modern JavaScript and CSS assets. However, the content is minimal and primarily focused on basic business information without extensive marketing or engagement features. Security posture is limited with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional but basic, suitable for a small hospitality business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adrop.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention adrop.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for adrop.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

A'Drop operates in the hospitality sector as a cocktail bar serving evening clientele. The business model is straightforward, focusing on local customers in Riga. The website lacks advanced marketing tools or analytics, indicating a small-scale operation. Contact information is clearly provided, supporting customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The absence of privacy and security policies suggests limited regulatory compliance focus. The business appears to maintain consistent branding and basic online presence but could improve digital maturity and trust signals.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical and resource URLs), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There are no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing immediate risk. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is available. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and improving incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Verify and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  4. Add security incident response contact information to support vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics and marketing tools to improve business insights and customer engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Cocktail bar located in Riga, Latvia offering evening service starting at 18:00 on Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday.
Key services
Cocktail bar services, Evening/night venue
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML
Frameworks
Flynt
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local cocktail bar in Riga, Latvia.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or registrant info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact info including phone, email, and physical address clearly provided.
  5. No security headers detected; SSL status unknown.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No forms or data collection elements present.
  8. Content is minimal but relevant to business.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  10. Content safety rating is 'questionable' due to alcohol and nightlife theme, but no explicit adult content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Flynt theme framework, using modern JavaScript modules and CSS assets. The site loads images responsively and uses lazy loading for performance optimization. Accessibility features such as skip links are present, but overall accessibility is basic. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags and canonical links. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Performance is moderate with no evident critical errors or broken elements. The technical stack is modern but underutilized for business growth and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adrop.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adrop.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.