Skip to main content

Security report for adriamediacontent.com

Adria Media Serbia · Media · Serbia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Adria Media Serbia operates as a content network presumably serving the Serbian or Adriatic media market. The website is minimalistic, containing only a title, a header, and a QR code image, with no detailed business descriptions or contact information. The domain is well-established, registered since 2014, which aligns with the business founding year, indicating a stable online presence. However, the lack of substantive content and absence of privacy or cookie policies limit the site's professionalism and user trust. Technically, the website uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking user interactions and Cloudflare for DNS services. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks, and no security headers were detected in the provided data. The site does not implement DNSSEC, which is a recommended security enhancement. Performance and SEO optimizations appear minimal due to the sparse content and lack of meta tags. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by Google Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no additional security headers or policies are present. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, and no contact channels for security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates poor compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile due to its minimal content and lack of sensitive data collection but suffers from poor content quality, limited transparency, and weak security posture. Strategic improvements in content, compliance, and security practices are recommended to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adriamediacontent.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Adria Media Serbia appears to be a small media content network focused on the Serbian or Adriatic region. The business model likely revolves around content distribution or media services, but no explicit services or revenue streams are detailed on the website. The lack of contact information and business details limits insight into market positioning or competitive advantages. The domain age suggests a stable operation since 2014. The company does not publicly disclose partnerships or subsidiaries. The minimal online presence and lack of marketing or affiliate programs indicate a low digital maturity level. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the current website data.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is presumably enabled as Google Analytics scripts are loaded over HTTPS, but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security are detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve domain security. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and best security practices. The site lacks a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, reducing transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security maturity is low, with recommendations to implement standard security headers, enable DNSSEC, and publish compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance website content quality and navigation to improve user experience and professional appearance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Adria Media Serbia
Description
Content network business presumably focused on media content in Serbia or the Adria region.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal with only a title, header, and a QR code image.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms available on the site.
  4. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  5. Domain is registered since 2014 with no privacy protection and uses Cloudflare DNS.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No CMS or platform detected from the HTML content.
  8. No social media or external business links found in the content.
  9. Website lacks SEO and accessibility optimizations.
  10. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML with minimal content and no detected CMS or frameworks. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for user tracking, indicating some level of digital marketing integration. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No advanced JavaScript frameworks or modern CMS platforms are detected. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content, but SEO and accessibility optimizations are lacking. The site does not include meta tags beyond the title, and no structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) is present. The lack of forms or interactive elements reduces attack surface but also limits user engagement capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adriamediacontent.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adriamediacontent.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.