Skip to main content

Security report for adra.cz

ADRA · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ADRA is a well-established non-profit humanitarian organization based in the Czech Republic, founded in 1997. The website serves as a platform to communicate its mission, projects, and to engage donors and volunteers. The organization maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and a clear focus on humanitarian aid and development services. The site targets a broad audience including donors, partners, and the general public interested in social causes. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Cookiebot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but could enhance security headers and monitor third-party scripts more closely. Overall, the site is trustworthy and compliant with GDPR, with a moderate level of user tracking balanced by transparent consent management.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of adra.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adra.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ADRA holds a strong market position as a humanitarian NGO with a long operational history. Its business model relies on donations and partnerships, with www.darujme.cz identified as a key partner for donation processing. The organization’s competitive advantage lies in its established reputation and international presence. The website content and structured data reflect a clear focus on non-profit activities, with no commercial or affiliate distractions. Growth indicators include active use of marketing and analytics tools to optimize outreach. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving major platforms like Google and Facebook for marketing and analytics. Strategic observations suggest maintaining transparency and enhancing contact information visibility could improve donor engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent managed via Cookiebot. Use of Google reCAPTCHA cookies indicates bot mitigation efforts. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not detected in the provided HTML, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The site uses several third-party scripts which should be regularly audited. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available on the site, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for strengthening defenses and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update all third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and broaden audience reach.
  5. Enhance visibility of contact information including emails and phone numbers for better user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ADRA
Description
ADRA is a non-profit organization focused on humanitarian aid and development projects.
Key services
Humanitarian aid, Development projects, Disaster relief, Community support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Resourcespace, SVG Support plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA cookies for bot detection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Meta Platforms, Inc., Seznam.cz, YouTube
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, YouTube tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit organization site.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Use of multiple third-party services for analytics and marketing with proper consent.
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from trusted sources and uses SVG support for scalable graphics. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in script loading and caching. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are limited but domain registrar is REG-ZONER with a long domain age supporting stability. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins and missing security headers which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adra.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adra.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.