Skip to main content

Security report for adra.cz

ADRA · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ADRA is a well-established non-profit organization based in the Czech Republic, focused on humanitarian aid and development projects. The website reflects a professional presence with clear branding and content targeted at donors, volunteers, and the general public interested in humanitarian causes. The domain age since 1997 supports the organization's longstanding market presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and cookie consent tools such as Yoast SEO and Cookiebot, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive GDPR-compliant privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adra.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ADRA operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on humanitarian aid, targeting a broad audience including donors and volunteers. The business model is donation and project-based, with no commercial sales evident. The organization benefits from a consistent brand and a mature domain age, which supports credibility. The website integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics, although the latter is not fully configured. The partnership ecosystem includes major platforms like Google and Facebook for analytics and advertising. Growth indicators are not explicit in the provided data, but the organization's digital presence is stable and compliant with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of Cookiebot for consent management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no publicly visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. The use of third-party scripts (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot) is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to strengthen header policies and incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  3. Complete configuration and verification of Google Analytics to ensure accurate and privacy-compliant data collection.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ADRA
Description
ADRA is a non-profit organization focused on humanitarian aid and development projects.
Key services
Humanitarian aid, Development projects, Community support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot pixel tracker
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (not fully configured), Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin.
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie declaration.
  3. No explicit terms of service page found.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Google Analytics is included but not fully configured.
  6. HTTPS is enabled and SSL configuration appears good.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding.
  8. No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information.
  9. Website content is professional and relevant to non-profit humanitarian aid.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags, although Google Analytics is not fully configured. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS with responsive design elements, providing good mobile optimization. Hosting and domain registration are stable and longstanding, with REG-ZONER as registrar. Performance is moderate, with no explicit speed metrics but no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and analytics configuration could be improved to reduce risks and enhance compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adra.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adra.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.