Skip to main content

Security report for ad110.com

ooogo LLC. · Media · N/a

Critical risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

25/100

Risk levelCritical

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AD110 is a non-profit project operated by ooogo LLC., focusing on art, design, creativity, and lifestyle content primarily targeted at design professionals and enthusiasts. The website offers curated articles, design resources, event coverage, and job listings within the creative industry. The platform positions itself as a niche media outlet with a long-standing presence since 2004, emphasizing open content sharing under Creative Commons licensing. Technically, the site is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js, with a custom CMS or proprietary platform, and includes advertising via Google Adsense. While the design and user experience are good, the site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and formal privacy or cookie policies, which impacts its security posture and privacy compliance. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and shows no suspicious WHOIS patterns, supporting its legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires significant improvements in security and privacy to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ad110.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
25

Not counted

  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a non-profit media platform under ooogo LLC., serving a specialized audience interested in art and design. Its revenue model likely includes advertising, as evidenced by Google Adsense integration. The site maintains a consistent brand and content quality, with a focus on curated design resources and community engagement through events and competitions. The presence of social media icons suggests an intent to engage users across platforms, although direct links are not embedded. The long domain age and stable registration indicate a mature presence in its niche. However, the lack of explicit contact information and formal policies may limit trust and growth potential. The parent company relationship with ooogo.com suggests a broader ecosystem of creative projects.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, lack of DNSSEC, and missing security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are published, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The domain registration includes standard registrar locks, which protect against unauthorized changes. The site does not appear to use a Web Application Firewall or other advanced protections. These gaps expose the site and its users to potential risks such as data interception and lack of compliance with privacy regulations. The security score is low, and critical improvements are necessary to safeguard user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to protect domain integrity and prevent DNS spoofing.
  4. Add essential security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ooogo LLC.
Description
艺术 设计 创意 生活
Key services
Publishing articles and images related to art, design, creativity, and lifestyle, Curated design resource library, Event and competition coverage, Job and recruitment listings in design fields
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, JavaScript ES Modules, CSS, Google Adsense
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit art and design media platform
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese with some English elements
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  5. Site uses HTTP only, no HTTPS detected
  6. Google Adsense used for advertising
  7. Social media icons present but no direct URLs found in HTML
  8. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  9. Domain is old and registered with GoDaddy with standard domain locks
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) with ES modules and CSS for styling. It preloads critical assets and uses asynchronous loading for ads. The site is mobile optimized and has a responsive design. Hosting details are not explicit, but DNS is managed via dnspod.net. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or proprietary solution. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured JSON-LD. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The lack of HTTPS and security headers is a significant technical risk. Advertising is managed through Google Adsense, but no analytics services are detected in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ad110.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ad110.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.