Skip to main content

Security report for actionoverwords.org

Chiesi · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ActionOverWords.org is a professionally designed website operated by Chiesi, a healthcare company focused on addressing the climate crisis as a health crisis. The site highlights Chiesi's commitment to sustainability, carbon emission reduction, and patient health through innovative inhaler technologies and transparent reporting. The website targets healthcare professionals, patients, and environmental stakeholders, positioning Chiesi as a leader in climate-conscious healthcare solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and employs modern web technologies, including multilingual support and GDPR-compliant cookie management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and privacy mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching actionoverwords.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Chiesi leverages this platform to communicate its sustainability initiatives and climate commitments, including a net zero emissions target by 2035. The business model focuses on pharmaceutical innovation with an emphasis on environmental impact reduction. The company collaborates with partners and aligns with global frameworks such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The website content and references to scientific studies and reports enhance credibility and market positioning. While direct contact information is not prominently displayed, the site integrates social media engagement and transparent reporting to build trust. The multilingual setup indicates a global or European audience focus.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses privacy and cookie consent plugins to comply with GDPR. No security.txt or explicit incident response policies are published, which could be improved. Security headers are not fully visible in the HTML source, suggesting potential enhancements. No vulnerable libraries or exposed credentials were found. The site does not appear to have a WAF challenge or blocking mechanisms, allowing full content access. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve user trust and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chiesi
Description
Chiesi is committed to combatting climate change through clear goals and dedicated efforts, focusing on reducing emissions and protecting patient health. The website outlines their sustainability initiatives, climate commitments, and transparent progress reporting.
Key services
Carbon-minimal inhaler development, Sustainability reporting, Climate and health advocacy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Analytics, Complianz GDPR plugin, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), tsParticles
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins (Complianz)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong focus on climate change and healthcare sustainability.
  3. Multilingual support via WPML plugin.
  4. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms implemented.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress ecosystem.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main pages.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building, with additional plugins for multilingual support (WPML) and GDPR compliance (Complianz). It uses jQuery and third-party libraries like tsParticles for interactive visual effects. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are limited but DNS parking is used. Performance is moderate, with some scope for optimization. The technical stack is well maintained and supports a professional user experience, though security header implementation could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with actionoverwords.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review actionoverwords.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.