Skip to main content

Security report for acsnorwich.com

Anglia Culinary Suppliers Ltd · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in DNS health, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anglia Culinary Suppliers Ltd is a well-established regional foodservice distributor based in East Anglia, UK, founded in 2002. The company supplies a broad range of frozen, chilled, and ambient products to professional caterers including hotels, pubs, restaurants, care homes, hospitals, nurseries, and educational institutions. Their market position is that of a trusted local supplier emphasizing quality service and a varied product range. The website reflects a professional business model focused on wholesale foodservice supply with clear contact details and company information. Technically, the site is built on the DotNetNuke CMS platform, hosted by Rackspace, and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap Lite. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is strong with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and suitable for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acsnorwich.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector, targeting professional catering businesses in East Anglia. Their competitive advantage lies in combining quality service with a diverse product offering. The business model is wholesale distribution, likely generating revenue through bulk sales to institutional clients. The website content and structure support this focus, with clear navigation to product lists, suppliers, delivery areas, and contact information. The company is registered in England with a long domain history, indicating stability. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The absence of terms of service or security policies suggests room for improvement in formalizing customer and security communications.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain status flags that prevent unauthorized transfers or updates, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency in security management. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user and business obligations.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior while maintaining compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Anglia Culinary Suppliers Ltd
Registration number
955910
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anglia Culinary Suppliers Ltd
Description
Anglia Culinary Suppliers LTD is a distributor to the catering trade in East Anglia supplying hotels, pubs, restaurants, care homes, hospitals, nurseries, and educational settings with frozen, chilled, and ambient food products.
Key services
Foodservice distribution, Frozen, chilled, and ambient food products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap Lite, Swiper.js
Frameworks
DotNetNuke (DNN)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer and update prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on foodservice distribution in East Anglia.
  3. Clear contact information and company details are provided.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond cookie management.
  7. Website uses DotNetNuke CMS and is hosted on Rackspace.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled for domain, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the DotNetNuke CMS platform, utilizing jQuery, Bootstrap Lite, and Swiper.js for UI components. Hosting is provided by Rackspace, a reputable provider. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic but includes meta tags and structured navigation. There is no evidence of modern frontend frameworks or advanced performance optimizations. The site uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by modernizing the tech stack and enhancing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acsnorwich.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acsnorwich.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.