Skip to main content

Security report for achemosgrupe.lt

Achemos Grupe · Energy · Lithuania

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Achemos Grupe is an established company in the energy sector based in Lithuania, with a domain registered since 2001. The website content provided is minimal and functions primarily as a CAPTCHA challenge page, likely to prevent automated access. Due to this access restriction, detailed business information, contact details, and policy documents are not available for review. The technical infrastructure shows basic JavaScript usage and a custom CAPTCHA implementation but lacks modern security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement. This limits the ability to fully assess the website's digital maturity and security posture. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with common data protection standards. Overall, the website appears to be in a restricted access state, which impacts user experience and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching achemosgrupe.lt

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company appears to be a significant player in the energy sector in Lithuania, supported by the domain age and registrar information. However, the website does not provide sufficient public-facing information about its services, market position, or partnerships. The lack of visible contact information and policies suggests the site may be intended for a limited audience or under maintenance. There is no evidence of active marketing, analytics, or advertising tools. The business model and revenue streams cannot be determined from the current content. The CAPTCHA gate may indicate a focus on security or controlled access to sensitive information.

Security posture

The website employs a CAPTCHA challenge to restrict access, which is a positive security measure against automated attacks. However, the lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies represent significant security and compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The minimal content and lack of contact details reduce transparency and user trust. The security score is low due to these factors, and the site would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  4. Deploy standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Improve website content to provide business information, enhance user experience, and build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is blocked by a CAPTCHA challenge page likely implemented as a security measure or anti-bot protection. The page contains minimal content and a CAPTCHA form to verify human visitors. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Achemos Grupe
Description
Achemos Grupe is a company operating in the energy sector, likely involved in chemical or industrial production given the domain and company name. The website content is minimal and primarily a CAPTCHA challenge page, so detailed business description is not available.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Base64 encoded images, Custom CAPTCHA implementation
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible without passing a CAPTCHA challenge.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies.
  3. No contact information or business details are presented on the page.
  4. The page is minimalistic and appears to be a security gate rather than a full website.
  5. No external links or social media links found in the HTML content.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond the CAPTCHA script.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses JavaScript and base64-encoded images primarily for CAPTCHA functionality. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. The hosting provider is linked to the domain registrar Telia Lietuva, AB, suggesting local hosting. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to the limited content and access restrictions. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. The technical implementation is basic and would benefit from modernization and improved infrastructure to support a full-featured corporate website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with achemosgrupe.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review achemosgrupe.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.