Skip to main content

Security report for acepostproduction.co.uk

Ace Post Production Ltd · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ace Post Production Ltd is a UK-based small media service company specializing in video editing and post production services. The company positions itself as a reputable and well-known provider, emphasizing fast, efficient, and honest service with open communication throughout projects. The website is built on the Wix platform, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with basic mobile optimization and SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details introduces some trust concerns, although the website content and contact information support legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acepostproduction.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ace Post Production operates in the media sector, targeting clients needing video editing services. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on project management and client satisfaction. The company leverages Wix for its online presence, which suggests a cost-effective approach to digital infrastructure. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company maintains direct contact channels via email and phone but lacks social media engagement or advanced marketing tools. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed. The company could benefit from enhanced digital marketing and compliance documentation to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There are no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing exposure risk. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, limiting preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add terms of service and incident response contact information to formalize legal and security posture.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and mobile responsiveness to improve user experience and compliance.
  5. Consider WHOIS data correction or domain registration verification to resolve inconsistencies and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ace Post Production Ltd
Description
Ace Post Production are at the forefront when it comes to delivering your editing needs from offline to online. Fast, efficient, and honest, Ace Post Production Ltd has become a reputable and well-known Video Editing Service. The team manages projects with skill and experience, providing open communication throughout each project.
Key services
Video editing, Offline to online editing, Sound services, Duplication & conversion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and styles.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company email and phone number.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No forms detected other than a mailto link and navigation links.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which is unusual for an active domain.
  9. Site content is professional and relevant to video editing services.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Wix.com, leveraging its standard JavaScript bundles, CSS, and hosting infrastructure. The site uses modern web technologies like HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with polyfills for compatibility. Performance is moderate, with video and image assets optimized for web delivery. SEO is basic with meta tags and some structured data but lacks advanced optimization. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and focus management but could be improved. No advanced frameworks or analytics tools are detected. The technical stack is suitable for a small business but could be enhanced for scalability and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acepostproduction.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acepostproduction.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.