Skip to main content

Security report for accountinglatvia.lv

SIA "Accounting Latvia" · Finance · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Accounting Latvia is a small Latvian accounting firm providing full-cycle accounting services to local and foreign companies, non-profit organizations, government, municipal institutions, and individuals. The company emphasizes digitalized processes, client confidentiality, and long-term cooperation. Their website is professionally designed using WordPress CMS, with multilingual support in Latvian, Russian, and English. The technical infrastructure is modern but lacks some advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but could be improved with additional headers and policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the business appears legitimate based on website content and trust signals such as testimonials and partner affiliations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching accountinglatvia.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector, targeting a niche of accounting services for diverse client types including businesses and non-profits. Their business model is service-oriented with a focus on digital transformation of accounting processes. The presence of partner logos and client testimonials indicates a stable market position and positive reputation. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise founded in 2011. The lack of visible analytics or marketing tools indicates a conservative digital marketing approach. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to strengthen business credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or incident response contacts, which are best practices for security transparency. No forms or input fields were found on the homepage, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard security headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Accounting Latvia"
Description
Mēs piedāvājam pilna grāmatvedības cikla pakalpojumus Latvijas, ārvalstu uzņēmumiem, bezpelņas, nevalstiskām, valsts un pašvaldību organizācijām un iestādēm, kā arī fiziskām personām.
Key services
Full accounting cycle services, Digitalized accounting processes, Client support and consultation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, PHP, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (Latvian, Russian, English).
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection forms present.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and jQuery.
  7. No social media links except internal contact mail link.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  10. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using standard themes and plugins, including jQuery and FlexSlider for UI components. The site loads multiple CSS and JS files from its own domain and WordPress core. Performance is moderate with no obvious heavy scripts or third-party trackers. Mobile optimization is good with responsive CSS and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. The site is hosted on an unknown provider with no explicit hosting details. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modern SEO and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with accountinglatvia.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review accountinglatvia.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.