Skip to main content

Security report for accommodationincroatia.net

Debant s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Accommodationincroatia.net operates as a specialized online platform offering a comprehensive catalogue of private apartments and holiday accommodations across Croatia. The business targets tourists seeking direct contact with property owners, providing listings for multiple Croatian regions with a focus on affordability and convenience. The platform is well-established, operated by Debant s.r.o., and enjoys a moderate market position particularly in the Czech Republic. Technically, the website employs legacy technologies such as jQuery and Google Adsense for monetization, with moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. However, the site lacks modern security headers and comprehensive privacy compliance features. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the active and professional website presence suggests possible WHOIS server issues rather than malicious intent. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and provides valuable services in the hospitality sector.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of accommodationincroatia.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching accommodationincroatia.net

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on connecting travelers directly with accommodation owners, bypassing intermediaries to offer competitive pricing and a wide selection. The platform supports multiple languages, enhancing accessibility for European tourists. Revenue streams likely include advertising via Google Adsense and paid listings or promotions. The company maintains partnerships with regional travel and advertising sites, expanding its ecosystem. Growth indicators include a large database of over 5,000 apartments and continuous updates with new properties. The lack of detailed company registration and contact information online may limit trust for some users, but the long operational history since 2002 supports credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS enabled and secure form submissions. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to clickjacking or content injection risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing legal risks especially given the European target audience. No evidence of DNSSEC or domain privacy protection was found, and the missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet compliance and best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security readiness.
  5. Enhance contact information transparency by adding phone numbers and physical addresses to build user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Debant s.r.o.
Description
Catalogue of private accommodations in Croatia with direct contact to house owners, offering apartments and holiday rentals across multiple Croatian regions for 2025.
Key services
Accommodation listings, Search and booking of apartments, Last minute offers, Travel and weather information
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Adsense, Google Tag Manager, jQuery UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure form submission via POST

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive accommodation listing platform for Croatia with multi-language support.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy.
  4. HTTPS is enabled but security headers are missing.
  5. Contact information limited to a single email address in footer; no phone or physical address found.
  6. Advertising via Google Adsense and tracking via Google Tag Manager present.
  7. No evidence of security or incident response policies published.
  8. Website content is safe and family-friendly.
  9. Technical implementation uses legacy charset windows-1250 and older jQuery versions.
  10. No CMS or modern frameworks detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML structure with charset windows-1250, which is outdated compared to UTF-8 standards. It relies on jQuery and jQuery UI libraries for UI components and Google Adsense for monetization. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking user behavior. The site is mobile responsive with dedicated CSS for different media. Performance is moderate, with some deferred script loading. No modern CMS or frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or legacy build. The lack of security headers and minimal accessibility features suggest technical debt and opportunities for modernization. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, and no CDN usage was identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with accommodationincroatia.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review accommodationincroatia.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.