Skip to main content

Security report for accessintel.com

Access Intelligence, LLC · Media · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Access Intelligence, LLC is a diversified media and events company focused on creating exceptional experiences that ignite connection and commerce across multiple sectors including media/marketing, energy/engineering, aerospace, defense, and healthcare. The company operates a portfolio of well-known media brands and event properties, serving B2B professionals with content, events, marketing services, and research. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Osano for privacy compliance. The site is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and provides comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and some security best practices observed, though explicit security headers and policies could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, which introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy, but the website content and branding strongly indicate a legitimate business presence. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching accessintel.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Access Intelligence holds a strong market position as an integrated media and event-driven company with a diverse portfolio of brands targeting multiple industries. Their business model leverages content publishing, event management, and marketing services to generate revenue. The company targets B2B professionals in media, marketing, energy, aerospace, defense, and healthcare sectors. The presence of multiple well-known brands and events indicates a broad partnership ecosystem and a mature operational structure. Leadership bios and social media presence reinforce credibility. The lack of public WHOIS data is a minor concern but may be due to privacy protection or recent registration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of privacy consent tools like Osano. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not clearly found in the HTML source, suggesting potential areas for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could be a compliance gap. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Analytics and Tag Manager, which should be regularly audited for security. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with more explicit policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly configure recommended security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Regularly audit and update all third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Ensure all forms have proper CSRF protection and input validation to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Consider verifying and publishing domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Access Intelligence, LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Access Intelligence, LLC
Description
Access Intelligence is a diversified media company creating exceptional experiences that ignite connection and commerce across multiple sectors including media/marketing, energy/engineering, aerospace, defense, and healthcare.
Key services
Media publishing, Event management, Marketing services, Research and consulting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.4.0, Featherlight lightbox, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Osano Consent Management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Osano for privacy compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Osano Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong presence of multiple media brands and event properties.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. No WHOIS data available publicly, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. Multiple external trusted domains linked, indicating broad partnerships.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 4.3.1 for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and integrates several third-party libraries such as Featherlight lightbox and Slick Carousel for UI components. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. Osano is implemented for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site loads with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Accessibility features appear to be implemented at a basic to good level. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with accessintel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review accessintel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.