Skip to main content

Security report for absaimnieks.lv

ABsaimnieks · Energy · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AB Saimnieks is a Latvian small business specializing in construction, property management, and energy supply design services. The company presents a professional website with clear service descriptions and contact information, targeting local clients in Latvia. The website is multilingual, supporting Latvian, English, and Russian languages, enhancing accessibility for a broader audience. The business model focuses on providing tailored solutions with an emphasis on quality and client satisfaction. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a standard but effective digital infrastructure. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, though no cookie consent mechanism is present, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching absaimnieks.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the construction, property management, and energy sectors within Latvia, serving local clients with a small business scale. The website content and structure suggest a service-oriented business model with direct client engagement. The presence of a Facebook page indicates some social media engagement. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and transparency. The partnership with Media Guru for website development indicates collaboration with local digital service providers. The business appears stable with a focus on quality service delivery rather than aggressive marketing or expansion.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could mitigate common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing legal risks. The use of common WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with a consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ABsaimnieks
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ABsaimnieks
Description
AB Saimnieks • Būvniecība un remonts • Apsaimniekošana • Energoapgāde. Uzņēmums AB Saimnieks piedāvā dažādus pakalpojumus katra klienta vajadzībām. Galvenās pakalpojumu grupas - Būvniecība un remonts, Apsaimniekošana un Energoapgāde. Laika gaitā esam guvuši visas nepieciešamās zināšanas un prasmes, lai izpildītu katra klienta pasūtījumu ar individuālu pieeju katram mūsu klientam.
Key services
Būvniecība un remonts (Construction and Repairs), Apsaimniekošana (Property Management), Energoapgāde (Energy Supply Design)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Lightbox plugin, Google Fonts, Font Awesome 4.7.0
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Right-click protection on lightbox images
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (Latvian, English, Russian).
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking, but no cookie consent banner detected.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source.
  9. Website design is professional and content is relevant to the business.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a standard set of plugins including Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Contact Form 7 for form handling. The use of Google Fonts and Font Awesome enhances visual appeal. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and webpage schema. No advanced frameworks detected beyond WordPress ecosystem. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with absaimnieks.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review absaimnieks.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.