Skip to main content

Security report for abrx.eu

SIA ABRX · Energy · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA ABRX is a Latvian company specializing in the implementation of industrial automation systems, electrification, and design services primarily for housing, communal services, industrial enterprises, and gas transmission infrastructure. The company also focuses on railway electrification and supplies imported equipment. Their market position is niche, serving industrial and energy sectors within Latvia. The website is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is accessible, with good content quality and navigation, but lacks advanced mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is enabled and forms include anti-CSRF tokens, but no security headers or published security policies are present. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abrx.eu

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy and transportation sectors, providing design and automation services with a focus on industrial clients. Their business model revolves around design services and equipment supply. The website content targets industrial enterprises and infrastructure operators, indicating a B2B focus. There is no evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries. The company appears small-sized with localized operations in Latvia. The lack of privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager shows engagement in digital marketing and user behavior tracking.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes some security best practices such as anti-CSRF tokens in forms. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to certain web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing legal risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet industry standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them to maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA ABRX
VAT number
LV40203317625
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA ABRX
Description
Implementation of industrial automation systems in housing and communal services, industrial enterprises, at gas transmission infrastructure facilities. Electrification and design for railways. Provides design services and supply of imported equipment.
Key services
Industrial automation systems implementation, Electrification and design for railways, Design and installation of electrical networks, Supply of imported equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form submission includes anti-CSRF hidden fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating GDPR compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No security or incident response policies published.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  6. Includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. Content is business-focused, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
  9. No social media links found on the homepage.
  10. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.10 with common plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It uses jQuery 3.6.0, Slick Carousel for sliders, Magnific Popup for modals, and FontAwesome for icons. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance. The design is responsive but only basic mobile optimization is observed. No advanced frameworks or platforms are detected. The site performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements found. However, the lack of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abrx.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abrx.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.