Skip to main content

Security report for abotak.org

Aborcyjny Dream Team · Healthcare · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AboTak is a pioneering Polish non-profit healthcare initiative providing the first stationary abortion clinic in Poland. Operated by the Aborcyjny Dream Team, it offers pharmacological abortion support, education, and advocacy. The organization is positioned as a trusted leader in abortion access and support within Poland, targeting individuals seeking safe abortion services and related assistance. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Astro and Alpine.js, hosted with Cloudflare DNS, and optimized for mobile and accessibility. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain protections, though improvements are needed in DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is lacking due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, with clear contact channels and strong branding.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abotak.org

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention abotak.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for abotak.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit focused on healthcare and women's reproductive rights, leveraging donations and sales of abortion-related accessories for funding. It maintains partnerships with recognized abortion support networks such as Aborcja Bez Granic and Women Help Women. The business model emphasizes community support, education, and direct service provision. Market positioning is strong as the first physical abortion clinic in Poland, with media coverage enhancing visibility. Growth potential exists with plans to expand to other cities. The partnership ecosystem includes donation platforms and international abortion support organizations, reinforcing credibility and operational reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from enhancements in DNS security, header implementation, and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aborcyjny Dream Team
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aborcyjny Dream Team
Description
Przychodnia Abotak to miejsce stworzone z myślą o osobach, które potrzebują aborcji. Oferuje wsparcie w przeprowadzeniu aborcji farmakologicznej, edukację oraz przestrzeń na rozmowy i spotkania. Jest pierwszą stacjonarną przychodnią aborcyjną w Polsce.
Key services
Wsparcie w aborcji farmakologicznej, Edukacja i konsultacje, Sprzedaż akcesoriów aborcyjnych, Pomoc w organizacji aborcji chirurgicznej za granicą
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js, Cloudflare DNS, Inter font, Astro framework (inferred from /_astro/ paths), mailgo (email and phone link enhancement)
Frameworks
Astro, Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and Cloudflare usage)
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited domain statuses

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Strong branding and professional design consistent with healthcare non-profit.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy-conscious approach.
  7. WHOIS privacy protection is used appropriately for sensitive business.
  8. DNSSEC not enabled, which could improve DNS security.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and lightweight tech stack including Astro for static site generation and Alpine.js for interactivity, which supports good performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting via Cloudflare DNS provides reliable DNS resolution and potential CDN benefits. The site includes custom fonts and optimized images, contributing to a positive user experience. However, the absence of CMS suggests manual content management, which may impact scalability. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach but limiting marketing insights. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abotak.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abotak.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.