Skip to main content

Security report for abethandicap.cz

Abet handicap · Energy · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Abethandicap.cz is a Czech Republic-based online platform and club dedicated to providing services and products for persons with disabilities (OZP) and club members. The platform offers a catalog of suppliers across various sectors, enabling members to access advantageous pricing while supporting social employment initiatives. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and specialized directory plugins, reflecting a moderate to advanced digital maturity. SEO and structured data are well implemented, enhancing discoverability. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professionally designed, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abethandicap.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche market focusing on social responsibility and support for disabled persons, leveraging a membership club model to drive engagement and sales. Its market position is specialized with a clear target audience in the Czech Republic. The platform integrates e-commerce capabilities and a directory of services, suggesting multiple revenue streams including membership fees and supplier registrations. The presence of social media channels and SEO optimization indicates active marketing efforts. The company was founded in 2019, consistent with domain age, and maintains a consistent brand identity. Partnerships appear limited but include the parent or related domain abethandicap.com.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliant with GDPR, and no exposed sensitive data. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. The use of WordPress and WooCommerce requires diligent patching and monitoring to mitigate common CMS vulnerabilities. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating open accessibility. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize risk of exploitation.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Abet handicap
Description
Portál služeb a produktů pro osoby se zdravotním postižením (OZP) a členy klubu, nabízí výhodné ceny a podporuje zaměstnávání OZP.
Key services
Online katalog služeb a produktů, Registrace firem do katalogu, Klubové výhody a slevy, Podpora zaměstnávání OZP
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, CitadelaWP Directory Plugin, Yoast SEO, jQuery, React (partial usage), Leaflet.js
Frameworks
WooCommerce, CitadelaWP
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats, WooCommerce Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (wordpress.com), WooCommerce Analytics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based platform focused on services for persons with disabilities in Czech Republic
  2. Good use of structured data and SEO plugins
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML content; contact likely via contact form
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
  8. Website uses HTTPS and standard security practices but could improve security headers
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and CitadelaWP Directory plugins for listing services. It uses jQuery and React libraries, along with Leaflet.js for map features. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format is implemented for rich search results. The site is hosted likely by Wedos, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization present. Some inline styles and scripts are used, and cookie consent is managed by Complianz GDPR plugin. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be optimized further for speed and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abethandicap.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abethandicap.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.