Skip to main content

Security report for abena.cz

ABENA - inkontinenční pomůcky, dětské pleny a kosmetika · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ABENA.cz is a Czech Republic based healthcare and retail company specializing in incontinence aids, adult diapers, baby diapers, and skincare cosmetics. The company operates an e-commerce platform with additional services such as free samples and a loyalty program, targeting healthcare providers, pharmacies, and individual consumers. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and comprehensive product categories. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers are not detected, indicating room for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which impacts domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and well-maintained. Overall, the site is safe, well-structured, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abena.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ABENA.cz holds a solid position in the Czech healthcare retail market, focusing on specialized products for incontinence and baby care. The business model combines B2B and B2C sales through an e-shop, supported by loyalty programs and free sample offerings to encourage customer retention. The company is part of UNTRACO s.r.o., indicating a structured corporate entity. The website's integration of multiple marketing and tracking tools suggests active digital marketing efforts. The presence of detailed product categories and downloadable prescriptive documents indicates a knowledgeable and service-oriented approach. The company maintains a Facebook presence to engage customers. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not currently undermine the operational business intelligence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of detected HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests potential vulnerabilities to common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The use of third-party tracking scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize supply chain risks.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain trust and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UNTRACO s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ABENA - inkontinenční pomůcky, dětské pleny a kosmetika
Description
Distributor and retailer of incontinence aids, adult diapers, baby diapers, skincare cosmetics, and related healthcare products.
Key services
Incontinence products, Baby diapers, Cosmetics, E-shop with loyalty program, Free samples, Prescriptive product information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap Icons, Bootstrap 5, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Adform tracking, Sentry error tracking, MediaElement.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Adform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses modern technologies and tracking tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain email and phone.
  6. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly detected; opportunity for improvement.
  8. Website is well structured with good navigation and mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 5 and Bootstrap Icons, ensuring responsive design and modern UI components. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Adform tracking, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site uses MediaElement.js for media playback and Sentry for error tracking, reflecting good operational monitoring practices. Performance is moderate with some optimization via CDN usage (jsdelivr) and image compression (webp). Mobile optimization is good with responsive menus and search functionality. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD markup. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abena.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abena.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.