Skip to main content

Security report for abedd.com

ABEDD · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ABEDD is a specialized supplier of high-quality laboratory animal bedding and enrichment products, primarily targeting laboratory animal facilities and biomedical research organizations. Their product focus is on dust-extracted aspen bedding that supports controlled environments and reproducible research outcomes under GLP and FELASA-aligned conditions. The website presents a professional image with clear product categories and a testimonial from a reputable research institute, indicating a niche market position. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins and page builders, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policies are published. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a concern for domain legitimacy, but the website content and contact information appear credible. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and technical implementation but could improve business credibility and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abedd.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention abedd.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for abedd.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ABEDD operates in the healthcare sector, supplying laboratory animal bedding and enrichment products. Their business model is B2B, serving research facilities requiring high environmental control. The company emphasizes product quality and compliance with research standards, leveraging testimonials to build trust. The website indicates a small-sized company based in Latvia, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers may limit direct customer engagement. The company uses standard WordPress infrastructure and GDPR-compliant cookie management, suggesting awareness of privacy regulations. No analytics or advertising networks are detected, indicating a focus on organic reach or direct client relationships. The absence of WHOIS data and security policies suggests areas for operational transparency improvement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, uses nonce-protected contact forms, and implements a cookie consent banner, reflecting good baseline security practices. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, limiting transparency for security researchers. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises questions about domain registration legitimacy. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be strengthened by adding security headers, publishing security policies, and verifying domain registration.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Include explicit company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ABEDD
Description
Higest quality laboratory animal bedding and enrichment from aspen (populus tremula). Dust-extracted aspen bedding tailored for laboratory animal facilities requiring high environmental control, supporting reproducible outcomes in preclinical, toxicology, and biomedical research under GLP and FELASA-aligned conditions.
Key services
Laboratory animal bedding, Animal enrichment products, Nesting materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, WPBakery Page Builder, Elementor, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, Complianz GDPR plugin, Contact Form 7
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Contact form uses nonce and validation

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on laboratory animal bedding and enrichment products.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact form and physical address provided, but no phone or email contacts explicitly found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Modern WordPress-based technology stack with common plugins.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using popular page builders such as WPBakery and Elementor, along with slider plugins like LayerSlider and Slider Revolution. It uses the Complianz GDPR plugin for cookie consent management and Contact Form 7 for user inquiries. The site loads CSS and JS resources efficiently with caching and minification. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data are properly implemented. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility features and security header implementation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abedd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abedd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.