Skip to main content

Security report for abbeypublishing.co.uk

Abbey Publishing Ltd · Media · United Kingdom

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Abbey Publishing Ltd is a UK-based business-to-business media company specializing in authoritative digital publications focused on facilities management, bulk solids handling, and energy management for the public sector. The company operates established niche magazines such as Building & Facilities Management (BFM), Bulk Solids Today (BST), and Energy Manager (EM), serving professional audiences in these sectors. The website is built on WordPress with a consistent branding approach and clear navigation, providing relevant business content and contact information primarily via email. Technically, the site uses a modern CMS platform with standard web technologies and is hosted by Krystal Hosting Ltd. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though security headers and incident response policies are absent. Overall, the site reflects a small but credible media publisher with a solid domain history and professional online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abbeypublishing.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Abbey Publishing Ltd holds a strong position in niche B2B media markets, leveraging long-established publications dating back to the early 1990s. Its business model centers on digital publishing targeting facilities management, bulk solids industry professionals, and public sector energy managers. The company maintains partnerships with its own magazine domains, enhancing its market reach. Revenue likely derives from advertising and subscriptions within these specialized sectors. The absence of phone contact and limited physical address information suggests a lean operational structure focused on digital engagement. The company’s transparent WHOIS data and domain age support its legitimacy and market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security events. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, minimizing attack surface. The site uses up-to-date WordPress core and plugins as per metadata, but no analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response contact or security policy page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Abbey Publishing Ltd
Description
Abbey Publishing Ltd is a business-to-business media company providing authoritative digital online publications focused on Building & Facilities Management, Bulk Solids handling, and Energy Management for the public sector and large estates.
Key services
Building & Facilities Management publication (BFM), Bulk Solids Today magazine (BST), Energy Manager Magazine (EM)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 7.0.2, jQuery 3.7.1, PHP (implied by WordPress), CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
WordPress Twenty Seventeen theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based B2B media site focused on niche publishing.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and relevant business information.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via a plugin with visible banner.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage or main content for data collection.
  6. Contact information limited to email addresses; no phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 7.0.2 using the Twenty Seventeen theme, leveraging jQuery 3.7.1 and standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3). Hosting is provided by Krystal Hosting Ltd, a reputable UK provider. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data present. No advanced analytics or marketing tools are detected, indicating a simple technical footprint. The site lacks advanced security headers and does not expose sensitive data or forms on the homepage, reducing risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abbeypublishing.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abbeypublishing.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.