Skip to main content

Security report for aaronpk.tv

Aaron Parecki · Media · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aaron Parecki operates a personal brand website focused on livestreaming tutorials, gear reviews, and consulting services. The site targets livestreaming enthusiasts and professionals seeking expert advice and educational content. The business model combines content creation with paid consulting and affiliate marketing, positioning Aaron Parecki as a niche expert in the media space. The website is well-branded, content-rich, and supported by active social media channels, enhancing its market presence. Technically, the website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery, hosted on Linode infrastructure. The design is responsive and user-friendly, with embedded video content and calendar integration. Analytics are handled via privacy-focused Fathom Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks CMS usage and some modern security headers, which could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. The domain is privacy protected but consistent with a personal brand site. No security or incident response policies are published, and no cookie or privacy policies are present, representing compliance gaps. DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are missing, suggesting room for security posture enhancement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and formal policies would strengthen its security and regulatory posture, supporting long-term business credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aaronpk.tv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aaron Parecki's website occupies a niche in the livestreaming media sector, leveraging personal expertise to deliver tutorials, gear reviews, and consulting. The business model is diversified through direct consulting bookings and affiliate marketing partnerships, including with Pilot Institute and other livestreaming consultants. The target audience is livestreaming hobbyists and professionals seeking practical advice. The site demonstrates a strong personal brand with consistent social media integration and professional video content. Growth potential lies in expanding consulting services and educational offerings. Partnerships with other consultants enhance service reach and credibility. The absence of a CMS and reliance on static or custom-built pages suggest a lean operational model focused on content quality over scale.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and published security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency for security issues. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS is justified given the personal brand nature of the site. The site does not use any known vulnerable libraries and employs minimal user tracking via Fathom Analytics, which is privacy-conscious. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal brand site but could be improved to meet higher compliance standards and user trust expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all audiences.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aaron Parecki
Description
Livestreaming tutorials and gear reviews by Aaron Parecki, offering educational content, consulting services, and livestream schedules.
Key services
Livestream tutorials, Gear reviews, Consulting calls, Livestream schedules, Referral links
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Fathom Analytics
Frameworks
HTML5 UP (design template)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://aaronpk.tv/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics
Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal brand site focused on livestreaming tutorials and consulting.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  4. Content is rich with embedded videos and consulting offers.
  5. Social media presence is strong and consistent.
  6. No phone numbers found; contact primarily via email and contact page.
  7. No CMS detected; site appears custom or static.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  9. Domain uses Linode hosting with multiple Linode nameservers.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a clean, modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, including jQuery for interactivity. It uses a responsive design template from HTML5 UP, ensuring good mobile optimization. Hosting is provided by Linode, a reputable VPS provider, indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with embedded YouTube videos and external scripts like Fathom Analytics. No CMS or dynamic backend detected, suggesting a static or custom-built site. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content. However, the lack of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt. The site could benefit from modern security enhancements and improved accessibility compliance to reduce risks and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aaronpk.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aaronpk.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.