Skip to main content

Security report for aaoprojekts.lv

SIA AAO Projekts · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA AAO Projekts is a Latvian company founded in 2015 specializing in electrical installations design, construction, repairs, inspections, and measurements. The company positions itself as a reliable partner offering high-quality services with certified personnel and necessary equipment. Their website reflects a professional and focused business model targeting clients needing electrical installation services in Latvia. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, hosted on a CDN for performance, and includes a live chat widget for customer engagement. The site is mobile optimized and well-structured, though it lacks some compliance documentation such as privacy and cookie policies. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but does not implement common security headers, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aaoprojekts.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector, focusing on electrical installation services including construction, design, and technical measurements. It serves a local/regional market in Latvia with a small business size. The business model is service-oriented with direct client engagement. The website provides clear contact details, company registration, and bank information, indicating transparency and legitimacy. No social media or partner domains are linked, suggesting a focused but limited digital ecosystem. The company’s competitive advantage lies in certified personnel and comprehensive service offerings in electrical installations. Growth indicators or parent/subsidiary relationships are not evident from the website.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No forms are present to analyze input validation or anti-spam measures. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible, which limits transparency in security management. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Consider adding contact forms with secure input validation and anti-spam protections to improve customer engagement securely.
  5. Regularly review and update security practices and compliance documentation to maintain a strong security posture and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA ”AAO PROJEKTS”
Registration number
LV45403043801
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA AAO Projekts
Description
SIA "AAO Projekts" is primarily engaged in electrical installations design, construction, repairs, inspections, and measurements. The company aims to be a reliable partner providing high quality and timely services. It possesses necessary equipment, materials, and certified personnel for construction, design, supervision, and measurements.
Key services
Electrical installations construction, Electrical installations design, Electrical installations inspections and measurements, Trenchless communication cable laying
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Google Fonts, Tawk.to chat widget
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tawk.to
Marketing tools
Tawk.to chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers, email, and physical addresses.
  4. No forms detected on the site for data collection.
  5. Use of modern frontend framework (Nuxt.js) and CDN hosting.
  6. No social media links found on the site.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy present.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Content is professional and relevant to electrical installation services.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js) with server-side rendering, improving SEO and performance. It leverages Google Fonts and a CDN (Cloudfront) for asset delivery, enhancing load times. The inclusion of Tawk.to chat widget adds real-time customer support capabilities. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with semantic HTML and meta tags for SEO. However, no CMS is detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Performance is moderate, likely due to optimized asset delivery but could benefit from further optimization. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected in the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aaoprojekts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aaoprojekts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.