Skip to main content

Security report for aao.org

American Academy of Ophthalmology · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain aao.org is registered to the American Academy of Ophthalmology, a well-established professional healthcare organization in the United States. However, the website content is currently inaccessible due to an AWS WAF human verification CAPTCHA challenge, preventing direct analysis of the site's content, policies, and contact information. The domain registration data is consistent and indicates a legitimate entity with a long operational history since 1995. The technical infrastructure includes AWS hosting and WAF protection, but no further details on CMS or frameworks are available due to content blocking. Security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of a WAF indicates some level of protection. Privacy and compliance policies are not accessible in the provided content. Overall, the site appears legitimate but currently inaccessible for detailed security and compliance evaluation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aao.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The American Academy of Ophthalmology operates in the healthcare sector, likely providing educational resources, professional development, and advocacy for ophthalmologists. The domain age and registrant information support a stable market position. Due to content blocking, no direct insights into business model, revenue streams, or partnerships can be derived. The organization likely targets medical professionals and healthcare providers. The lack of accessible contact or policy information limits assessment of customer engagement and compliance maturity.

Security posture

The website is protected by AWS WAF, which enforces a CAPTCHA challenge to mitigate automated access and potential abuse. This indicates a proactive security measure but also restricts legitimate user access and automated analysis. No security headers or SSL details were available for review. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts were found. The security posture appears cautious but lacks transparency and publicly accessible security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Review and optimize WAF rules to reduce legitimate user friction while maintaining security.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and security policies accessible without CAPTCHA challenges.
  3. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain security and trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security posture.
  5. Provide publicly accessible incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic AWS WAF detected. The HTML content is a human verification CAPTCHA page served by AWS WAF, blocking direct access to the actual website content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
American Academy of Ophthalmology
Description
Not available due to access restriction; the domain is owned by American Academy of Ophthalmology, a professional medical organization likely focused on ophthalmology education and services.

Technology

Stack
AWS WAF, JavaScript, Amazon Ember font

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by AWS WAF human verification challenge
  2. No metadata, structured data, or business content accessible
  3. No contact information or policies found in the provided HTML
  4. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate
  5. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the blocked content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure and protected by AWS WAF, which currently blocks direct access with a CAPTCHA challenge. The tech stack includes JavaScript and custom fonts but no CMS or frameworks were detectable. Performance, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to blocked content. The domain uses multiple AWS DNS name servers but lacks DNSSEC. The site would benefit from improved metadata, structured data, and security headers to enhance technical maturity and search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aao.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aao.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.