Skip to main content

Security report for aaib.lv

AAIB.lv · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AAIB.lv is a small engineering office based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in electricity supply network design and building management system design. With over 10 years of experience, the company positions itself as a competent and professional service provider in the energy sector. The website is built on the Wix platform, featuring a professional design and clear contact information, including a phone number and physical address. Technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript polyfills and error monitoring via Sentry, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and serves its business purpose effectively, but lacks some compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aaib.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aaib.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for aaib.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector, targeting clients requiring engineering consulting and design services in Latvia. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on specialized engineering solutions. The website content and structured data reinforce the company's local market presence and expertise. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The lack of WHOIS data limits full verification of domain legitimacy. The company does not appear to engage in advertising or affiliate marketing, focusing instead on direct service provision. The website's professional presentation and clear contact details support business credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. It employs Sentry for error monitoring, which is a positive security practice. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance security readiness. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or security@ email to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities and ensure secure operation.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
A.Ābeles inženieru birojs
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AAIB.lv
Description
A.Ābeles inženieru birojs’’ has been operating in the field of engineering for more than 10 years. They are a competent group of specialists offering services in electricity supply network design, building management system design, and other engineering services.
Key services
electricity supply network design, building management system design, engineering consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Sentry (error monitoring), core-js polyfills, focus-within-polyfill
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website built on Wix platform with professional design
  2. No visible forms for data collection detected in provided HTML snippet
  3. Contact phone number and physical address clearly presented in structured data
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. No email addresses explicitly found in HTML content
  7. Use of Sentry for error monitoring indicates some level of operational security
  8. No suspicious or malicious scripts detected
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected
  10. No social media links explicitly found in provided content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's hosting and content delivery infrastructure. It uses modern JavaScript polyfills for compatibility and includes Sentry for error monitoring. The site is mobile optimized and has a good design quality. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present. Performance is moderate, typical for Wix-hosted sites. Accessibility features are basic but present. The lack of custom frameworks or CMS beyond Wix limits technical complexity but also reduces customization flexibility. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aaib.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aaib.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.