Skip to main content

Security report for aafp.org

American Academy of Family Physicians · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) is a large, well-established professional association representing over 128,000 family physicians, residents, and students. The organization provides advocacy, education, patient and practice resources, and continuing medical education (CME) to its members. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. It targets healthcare professionals specializing in family medicine and supports their professional development and advocacy efforts. Technically, the site uses a modern technology stack including Adobe Experience Manager CMS, various analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, HubSpot, and multiple social media pixels. The site is well optimized for mobile and accessibility, with good SEO practices and secure HTTPS implementation. Security headers and best practices are in place, though there is room for improvement in public vulnerability disclosure and incident response visibility. The security posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR considerations. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is justified for this type of organization, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and secure. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency around security incident response, maintaining up-to-date third-party libraries, and considering publishing security certifications to further boost trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aafp.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AAFP holds a dominant position in the family medicine healthcare sector in the United States. Its business model revolves around membership services, CME offerings, advocacy, and resource provision. Revenue streams likely include membership dues, CME course fees, event sponsorships, and advertising. The organization targets family physicians, residents, and medical students, providing them with career support, education, and advocacy tools. Partnerships with affiliated organizations such as the AAFP Foundation and FamMedPAC strengthen its ecosystem. The website's extensive content and event promotion indicate active engagement and growth orientation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive information. Use of secure login/logout endpoints and absence of vulnerable libraries in the visible code are positive indicators. However, there is no publicly visible vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact information, which are areas for improvement. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Make incident response contact information more visible and accessible on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider obtaining and displaying recognized security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001) to enhance trust.
  5. Continue monitoring and improving privacy compliance, especially regarding data retention and user consent.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
American Academy of Family Physicians
Description
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) represents 128,300 family physicians, residents, & students, providing advocacy, education, patient & practice resources.
Key services
Continuing Medical Education (CME), Advocacy, Practice and career resources, Events and conferences, Publications and journals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, Google Tag Manager, LivePerson chat, HubSpot scripts, TikTok pixel, StackAdapt, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics (omtrdc.net)
Frameworks
Custom AAFP web components, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Secure login and logout URLs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt, Bing Ads, Google DoubleClick, TikTok Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Adobe Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained
  2. Content is comprehensive and targeted to family medicine professionals
  3. Strong presence of educational and advocacy resources
  4. Multiple social media and external trusted links
  5. Use of modern tracking and marketing technologies
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected but consistent with legitimate organization
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, leveraging custom web components and a variety of third-party analytics and marketing tools. It uses jQuery 1.8.3, which is an older version and may warrant updating. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses multiple preconnect hints to optimize resource loading from various domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust, scalable, and user-friendly experience with some opportunities for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aafp.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aafp.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.