Skip to main content

Security report for a38.hu

A38 Hajó · Hospitality · Hungary

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A38 Hajó is a well-established cultural venue and concert ship located in Budapest, Hungary, offering a diverse range of live music events, cultural programs, and hospitality services including a bar and bistro. The website reflects a mature business with a strong local and international presence, supported by partnerships with cultural organizations and sponsors. The target audience includes music lovers, cultural enthusiasts, and young artists seeking performance opportunities. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including October CMS, Foundation framework, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar with proper consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. The site is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and provides clear navigation and contact information. Overall, the website is trustworthy and compliant with GDPR requirements, supporting a positive user experience and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching a38.hu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality and cultural entertainment sectors, leveraging event hosting and food & beverage sales as primary revenue streams. Its market position is strong within Budapest's cultural scene, supported by collaborations with European cultural networks and local sponsors. The business model focuses on live events, artist support programs, and venue rental services. The website content and partnerships indicate a commitment to nurturing young talent and maintaining a vibrant cultural ecosystem. Growth indicators include active event scheduling and ongoing cultural initiatives. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processors like Barion and cultural networks like Liveurope, enhancing operational capabilities and market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Tracking and analytics tools are used responsibly with user consent. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating a potential compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards and broaden audience reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A38 Hajó
Description
A38 Hajó is a concert ship, cultural center, bar and bistro located in Budapest, Hungary. It hosts music events, cultural programs, and offers food and beverage services. It supports young musicians and cultural initiatives.
Key services
Concerts and live music events, Bistro and bar services, Event organization and venue rental, Cultural programs and workshops
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Barion Pixel, Foundation Framework
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with consent mechanism
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Barion Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional cultural venue site with event listings and rich content.
  2. Clear presence of GDPR and cookie consent mechanisms.
  3. Multiple trusted partnerships and certifications displayed.
  4. No security or content blocking detected.
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with consent.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on October CMS with the Foundation front-end framework, integrating multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Barion payment pixel. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The technical implementation is modern but could benefit from improved security headers and enhanced accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses structured data for events and integrates social media and blog content effectively. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs with opportunities for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with a38.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review a38.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.