Skip to main content

Security report for a-hotel.com

AdminIT s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A-HOTEL.com is an established online travel agency specializing in worldwide accommodation bookings, offering over 3 million hotels, apartments, and other lodging options across more than 150,000 destinations globally. The platform targets travelers seeking convenient and instant online booking with competitive pricing and a broad selection. The business operates primarily from the Czech Republic under the company AdminIT s.r.o., providing additional services such as car rentals, flights, and group reservations. The website supports multiple languages and currencies, enhancing its global reach. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript-based stack with integrations including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and a live chat service (Livechatoo). It supports mobile platforms with dedicated iOS and Android apps. The site demonstrates good SEO practices, mobile optimization, and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and additional accessibility enhancements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with HSTS headers, uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and does not publish a security policy or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially impacting trust and legitimacy verification. Overall, A-HOTEL.com presents a professional and trustworthy platform for accommodation booking with solid technical and privacy compliance foundations. Strategic improvements in security headers, transparency in domain registration, and formal security policies would enhance its security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching a-hotel.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention a-hotel.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
149
Employees
0
Customers
149
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
23%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for a-hotel.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

A-HOTEL.com holds a strong market position as a comprehensive accommodation booking platform with a vast inventory and global coverage. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of offerings, instant booking confirmation, and multilingual support. The business model is commission-based online travel agency services, supplemented by ancillary offerings like car rentals and flights. The target customers are leisure and business travelers worldwide. The company demonstrates growth potential through mobile app availability and active social media engagement. Partnerships with major platforms and quality certifications support its market credibility. However, the lack of transparent WHOIS data and limited security disclosures may pose challenges in trust-building with certain customer segments.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS and HSTS implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, reflecting good data protection awareness. However, the absence of additional security headers and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness and could be a vector for phishing or impersonation risks if not properly managed. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, suggesting areas for improvement in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and optimize website performance to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AdminIT s.r.o.
Description
Hotels, Apartments and Accommodation Worldwide | Current Prices, Availability, Online Booking and Confirmation.
Key services
Hotel and apartment booking, Car rentals, Flight bookings, Group reservations, Travel consultancy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Livechatoo chat, LightGallery, jQuery UI Autocomplete, Google Analytics
Platforms
Web, iOS app, Android app
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS header present
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Livechatoo chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional online accommodation booking platform with extensive global coverage.
  2. Content is well structured with multi-language support and currency options.
  3. No signs of adult or malicious content.
  4. Security headers are minimal but HTTPS and HSTS are implemented.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone number.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active.
  9. No visible security or vulnerability disclosure policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with third-party integrations for analytics, tag management, and live chat support. It supports multiple languages and currencies, indicating a scalable internationalization approach. Mobile optimization is good, supported by dedicated mobile apps. The site uses jQuery UI for autocomplete and datepicker functionalities. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in resource loading and caching. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with a-hotel.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review a-hotel.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.