Skip to main content

Security report for 911p2p.io

Domains By Proxy, LLC (registrant proxy) · Finance · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

911 Crypto P2P operates as a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchange platform specializing in fiat settlement for crypto transactions. The website targets cryptocurrency traders seeking direct exchange services with fiat currency integration. Positioned as a niche player in the crypto finance sector, it leverages partnerships with related financial and crypto services such as Dukas.io and Dukascoin. The platform was established in 2021 and maintains a modern, mobile-optimized web presence with consistent branding and moderate trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 911p2p.io

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on facilitating P2P crypto trades with fiat settlement, appealing to users who prefer decentralized exchange mechanisms. The company appears to maintain strategic partnerships with established financial entities, enhancing its market credibility. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees and value-added services related to crypto trading. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and compliance. The use of privacy-protected domain registration aligns with industry norms for crypto businesses.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses reputable DNS hosting via AWS. Security headers are assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. The domain status flags provide protection against unauthorized domain changes. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a moderate security maturity level. The integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which is balanced by a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and disclose a formal vulnerability disclosure policy and security incident response contacts.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  4. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domains By Proxy, LLC (registrant proxy)
Description
Fiat settlement for P2P crypto exchange transactions
Key services
P2P crypto exchange, Fiat settlement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, AWS DNS, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a P2P crypto exchange platform focused on fiat settlement
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in content
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  7. Domain uses privacy protection service
  8. Website design is modern and mobile optimized
  9. No WAF or blocking detected
  10. WHOIS data consistent with privacy protection norms in crypto industry
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Google Analytics, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. The domain is registered via a privacy protection service through GoDaddy, which is common in the crypto sector. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of CMS or framework details suggests a custom or lightweight implementation. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 911p2p.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 911p2p.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.