Skip to main content

Security report for 80art.lv

80art.studio · Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

80art.studio is a professional audio recording and voiceover service provider based in Latvia, targeting businesses and individuals seeking high-quality audio production for advertising, video, and other media projects. The website presents a well-structured, professionally designed platform with clear service descriptions and multiple client testimonials that reinforce its market credibility. The company offers multilingual voice recordings and emphasizes quick turnaround times and quality service. Technically, the site is built on the Mozello platform, leveraging Amazon Cloudfront CDN for hosting and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Fancybox. Google Analytics and Google Ads conversion tracking are implemented for marketing and analytics purposes. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security headers and published security policies are absent. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure, which slightly impacts trust but is common for small businesses. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with basic privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 80art.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector, focusing on audio production services including voice recordings in multiple languages, radio jingles, and advertising audio. Its business model is service-oriented, catering to regional clients as evidenced by testimonials from known companies. The website's content and client feedback suggest a stable market position with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. The use of modern marketing tools and analytics indicates a digital-savvy approach. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main page suggests contact is managed through dedicated pages or forms, aligning with professional business practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security.txt file or published incident response contacts limits transparency in vulnerability disclosure and incident management. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Add explicit security and privacy policies on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Consider adding visible company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and tracking scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
80art.studio
Description
Profesionāli audio ieraksti 80art studijā. Reklāmas, video, IVR un daudz kas cits – ātri un kvalitatīvi ieraksti Taviem projektiem.
Key services
Audio recordings, Voice recordings in multiple languages, Radio jingles, Advertising audio production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozello platform scripts
Platforms
Mozello website builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and modern tracking and marketing tools.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on main page.
  6. Multiple client testimonials with logos enhance trust.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response info published.
  8. No forms detected on the main page; contact likely via dedicated contact page.
  9. Site is built on Mozello platform and uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but somewhat dated JavaScript stack including jQuery 2.2.4 and Fancybox 3, hosted on the Mozello platform with Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. Google Analytics and Google Ads tracking are integrated for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by external scripts and CDN usage. There is no evidence of a custom backend framework or CMS beyond Mozello. The technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 80art.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 80art.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.