Skip to main content

Security report for 4dinfra.com

4D Infrastructure · Finance · Australia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

4D Infrastructure is a boutique asset management firm specializing in investments in listed infrastructure companies worldwide. Positioned as a Bennelong boutique, it leverages the parent company's resources and brand reputation to serve financial advisers, personal investors, and institutional investors. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content about funds, investment rationale, and insights. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 with modern analytics and marketing integrations, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though it lacks published security policies and incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS registration data reduces transparency and trust from a domain registration perspective, warranting further verification. Overall, the site is credible and professionally maintained but could improve in security transparency and domain registration clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 4dinfra.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector with a focus on infrastructure investments, targeting a niche market of investors interested in global infrastructure assets. Its business model is asset management through managed funds, leveraging the Bennelong Fund Management Group's backing. The website indicates a small-sized boutique with a strong parent company relationship, enhancing market position and trust. The presence of multiple office locations in major Australian cities supports a regional operational footprint. Marketing and analytics tools indicate active user engagement and data-driven strategies. The lack of detailed company founding information and registration data suggests a need for enhanced corporate transparency. The partnership ecosystem includes Bennelong Fund Management and social media channels for outreach. Growth indicators are implied through content updates and multi-channel presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Use of asynchronous loading for analytics and marketing scripts reduces performance impact but requires ongoing monitoring for third-party risks. The absence of security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts is a gap in security maturity. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance, but cookie consent mechanisms could be more explicit. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies, incident response contacts, and implementing recommended HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response and contact information.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance cookie consent transparency with explicit user consent mechanisms and detailed cookie usage disclosures.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
4D Infrastructure
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
4D Infrastructure
Description
4D Infrastructure is a boutique asset management investing in listed infrastructure companies across all four corners of the globe. Learn more about our managed funds.
Key services
Managed funds, Investment in listed infrastructure companies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Outbrain, Crazy Egg
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Crazy Egg, Marketo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Outbrain
Tracking pixels
Crazy Egg, Marketo
Marketing tools
Marketo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional financial services site with clear branding and structured navigation.
  3. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and reasonably comprehensive.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.7.1 and various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Outbrain, and Crazy Egg. The site uses asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. Preloading of fonts and structured metadata (JSON-LD) enhance SEO and accessibility. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though hosting provider details are not disclosed. There is an opportunity to improve technical security by adding security headers and formalizing security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 4dinfra.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 4dinfra.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.