Skip to main content

Security report for 3pavari.lv

SIA “MEDU” · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

3 pavāru restorāns is a small, Michelin Selected restaurant located in Riga, Latvia, specializing in seasonal Latvian cuisine with a focus on quality and guest experience. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear business and contact information, supporting a strong market position in the hospitality sector. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and web fonts, with good SEO and accessibility basics. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent, but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained with room for security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 3pavari.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The restaurant operates in the hospitality sector targeting food enthusiasts and local/visiting diners seeking fine dining experiences in Riga. Its business model includes degustation menus, private events, and gift card sales. The Michelin Selected status enhances its competitive advantage and market positioning. The company, SIA “MEDU”, is a small entity with a clear local presence. The website supports marketing and customer engagement through social media and newsletter subscriptions. The lack of WHOIS data limits external verification but internal content and branding indicate a credible business.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization, indicating privacy awareness. A cookie consent banner is present, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no published security or incident response policies were found. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. The site appears free of obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Security maturity is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header security and publish formal policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed privacy compliance information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “MEDU”
Registration number
40103954457
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “MEDU”
Description
3 pavāru restorāns is a modern restaurant located in Riga, Latvia, offering seasonal, high-quality Latvian cuisine with a focus on product purity and an engaging taste experience. The restaurant is situated in the historic Jēkaba Kazarmu complex and is recognized in the Michelin Selected Restaurants guide since 2024.
Key services
Degustation menus, Private events hosting, Gift card sales, Fine dining reservations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts, HTML5shiv, Respond.js, Bootstrap (implied by classes and dropdowns), jQuery (implied by carousel and dropdowns)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with Google Analytics config forcing SSL
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent banner with acceptance mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed restaurant site with clear branding and consistent content.
  2. Content is in Latvian with English language option available.
  3. Includes clear contact information with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Includes cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicating GDPR compliance.
  5. Uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  8. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, Foursquare, Tripadvisor.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, and Typekit fonts. It appears to use Bootstrap and jQuery for UI components. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. Technical risks are low but could be improved by adding security headers and ensuring up-to-date dependencies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 3pavari.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 3pavari.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.