Skip to main content

Security report for 3bscientific.com

3B Scientific · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

3B Scientific operates a professional German-language website focused on medical simulation, anatomical models, and scientific educational tools. The company targets medical educators, healthcare professionals, and scientific educators with a robust e-commerce platform and comprehensive product offerings. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with active social media channels and a newsletter signup, indicating strong market positioning in healthcare education and training. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, integrates Google Tag Manager and HubSpot for marketing and analytics, and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given consistent branding and professional content. Overall, the site is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 3bscientific.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 3bscientific.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
100
Employees
0
Customers
91
Third parties
9
Weak passwords
13%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for 3bscientific.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

3B Scientific is positioned as a key player in the healthcare education and medical simulation sector, offering a wide range of products including anatomical models and simulation tools. Their business model centers on B2B and B2C e-commerce sales, supported by a multilingual website and extensive product categorization. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a strong social media presence to engage with customers and industry professionals. Growth indicators include active event participation and product launches highlighted on the site. The company appears to operate primarily in Germany with a large organizational size, though specific founding year and parent company details are not disclosed.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No security.txt or explicit incident response contacts were found, indicating room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited to mitigate risks. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting potential enhancement opportunities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could benefit from formalized policies and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact information for reporting vulnerabilities or abuse.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with WCAG standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS information or using verified domain registration to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
3B Scientific
Description
3B Scientific offers medical simulation, anatomical models, educational tools for medical and scientific training, and equipment for physics and biology education.
Key services
Medical simulation products, Anatomical models, Educational materials for biology, physics, and therapy, Online shop and quick order system
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Slick Carousel, Typekit Fonts, Cookie Consent Manager CCM19
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  5. Ecommerce functionality with add to cart and wishlist features present.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual but not necessarily suspicious given brand presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Tag Manager, with integration of HubSpot for marketing automation and CCM19 for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. Fonts are served via Adobe Typekit. The presence of multiple external scripts and social media embeds indicates a complex but well-managed infrastructure. Performance is moderate with potential for optimization in script loading and caching. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable e-commerce experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 3bscientific.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 3bscientific.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.